Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (10562)	12/6/2010 6:23:22 PM
From: Solon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

I have told him innumerable times that I am fundamentally opposed to all abortions but I support the RIGHT to them. Just as I told him dozens of times I did not personally endorse, support, or advocate any perversions such as pederasty but I supported the Canadian Human Rights Act in permitting all such acts where LEGAL (which of course subsumes, competence, willingness, etc.). He knows my positions on all these matters but decided several years ago to attack me with lies and misrepresentations because he thinks he is entitled in that he is doing "God’s work" to discredit and harm me for my staunch advocacy (“Should God Be Replaced” ) of a rational approach to what we find worthy as moral teachings, teachers, and life values. If he were more of a gnat I should be more upset. But really he is merely a pissant!

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (10562)	12/7/2010 2:32:10 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Nice of you to call me a liar when he freely and openly admits that he "supports" all abortions at any stage of development for any reason that the woman chooses. You may buy his sophistic distinction without a difference, but I do not. If you advocate/argue for Partial Birth Abortions as a right: then you are at the very least, a Partial Birth Abortion supporter. In fact, in that case he is, by definition, a Partial Birth Abortion rights "Advocate"! A fully formed and viable fetus is not as he claimed in 2005 "an egg" It is a distinct and unique, individual Human Being, and it is in societies interest to protect the right of that unique individual to life, even if it "inconveniences" another unique and individual Human Being. BTW, I do recognize that in the case where a mothers own life is "actually" threatened there is a good case for for the lesser of two evils if the Mother chooses to live. That is not however, always the case.