Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (25525)	11/11/1997 10:52:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

After reading the tripe you post on Bre-X, I'm not surprised that you don't know anything about mining stocks. Keep an eye on us, pal-we'll show you what it's all about..

To: Graystone who wrote (25525)	11/11/1997 10:52:00 PM
From: reg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

When this stock was first brought to my attention a couple of years ago by Ron I believe in his writeup he mentioned that the precious metals could be leached out with common household chemicals. Has this changed? If not then why bother with all the verification stuff? Why not just start leaching out the gold? If IPMCF is producing then who can argue with them? Also have their been any assays released on the hard rock deposit? If not, why not? Should not conventional assays work on the hard rock source? What is taking so long?

To: Graystone who wrote (25525)	11/11/1997 11:34:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Graystone... It's not important to me what you think. >IPMCF is a total con job, a lie, a complete ripoff. That is my opinion and I don't care if you and others on this thread don't like that.< I understand you think that. So, why don't you quit shouting it over and over? I don't agree with you, but it is OK with me if you write it as long as you do it in a reasonably acceptable style. You wrote >The pack of pirahnas that lives on this thread need to be counterbalanced by some clear thinkers like EC< You are probably right except that EC is sure not a clear thinker. He rambles, gets confused, mistates his facts and does it all in a very rude and hostile way. Why does he have to come on and post more than any 10 other people and do it in a style that offends everyone? The rest of your points that are in all caps have been answered many times. They are obviously retorical questions.