SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (69590)12/14/2010 7:34:12 AM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217906
 
according to maurice, the narcos are doing good per drug trade into usa, and

according to hamoon, the british empire did good by shipping drugs to china



To: carranza2 who wrote (69590)12/16/2010 8:25:19 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217906
 
carranza,

are you surprised that the narcos haven't bothered the mining companies? do most of the mines just happen to be in areas that aren't occupied by narcos?



To: carranza2 who wrote (69590)12/16/2010 10:30:12 AM
From: bull_dozer5 Recommendations  Respond to of 217906
 
> Forget Afghanistan and Iraq and Iran, the battle starts at the Rio Bravo.

We were never a people to miss a chance to turn a buck, even on drugs, hopelessness, fear, poverty, criminality and misery. These days there is plenty of misery to go around, especially since drugs generate the other others. None of which is news to most of the lefties reading this. However, to the average American watching Jay Leno crack Tiger Woods jokes, the fact that a sizable portion of our national economy depends upon keeping the drugs flowing across our borders would come as surprising news. Not surprising enough to get up off the couch for, but nonetheless surprising for a moment.

As for the real numbers in this miserable drama of national affairs, only the pointy heads care. For most of us, national numbers don't mean much these days. Once the discussion soared off into the tens of trillions, average working folks lost any numerical moorings they might have had, which were never very good to begin with. So the numbers regarding the massive industries based on the War on Drugs simply get lost somewhere out there among the trillions. After all, what's $50 billion a year spent for our narcotics cops?

Well, $50 billion makes just chasing the dopers an industry the same size as the movie business, and slightly bigger than the telecom industry. Furthermore, the narco cop industry is joined at the hip with the American prison industry -- the world's largest -- a $45 billion enterprise based on drug convictions. Which of course entails the court systems and billions to the syndicate of lawyers, the state's officially recognized commissars of peasant conflicts. Standing in the wings are the rest of the commissariat, such as the drug rehabilitation professionals. With such a fat hog of public funds there for the cutting, it was only natural that the Department of Homeland Security would increasingly focus its 225,000 employees and $42 billion budget on the drug wars. As for the working slob who has never even seen a bag of weed, he gets his chance to contribute to the drug war industry too, through drug testing in the workplace (25 million tests per year at between $25 and $50 each). With America now panhandling on the global street corner for international loans, nobody is about to cut loose the domestic profits of the drug war industry -- profits sustained, of course, by its dedicated lack of success.

"It's all in how you look at it," says Larry, who likes his weed (I've never met a retired cop down here who doesn't). Larry says it "defrags his mind.) "Ever since Richard Nixon declared war on drugs in 1971, drugs have gotten cheaper, stronger and easier to get."


Message 27029858