SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (42044)12/15/2010 10:05:30 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Ginsberg, being of the liberal Justices has said something to the affect that the use of the Commerce Clause has been used inappropriately in the past. This was before this issue was near the court. It will be interesting how she rules.



To: Bill who wrote (42044)12/15/2010 10:33:25 AM
From: John2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103300
 
The plaintiff must prove to the liberal justices that the commerce clause will prove debilitating and harmful for Blacks, illegal aliens, convicted felons, criminals, gays, lesbians, Muslims, child molesters, and drug addicts. If the plaintiff can provide evidence of such an assertion, the liberal justices will vote against the use of the commerce clause. Otherwise, no way! -ng-


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News