Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Skipper who wrote (13630)	11/13/1997 11:53:00 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

<< As long as we are looking for evidence, where is your evidence that the world is self-existing? >> I guess that we can agree that the world exists. It either was created or is self-existing. The evidence for a Creator is silly Bible stories. If you believe in a Creator, then you must also believe that He is responsible for genetic defects and viral and bacterial disease, (which science is working hard to correct), the flooding in Somalia which killed thousands of helpless people (just the latest in a long list of catastrophes that He, apparently to amuse himself, unleashes on the Humans and animals, that you say he created), and me, who would question His existence. The evidence for a Universe that has been in existence for at least 10 billion years, with the earth a relative newcomer at only 4 billion years is very strong, and getting stronger daily. The evidence for evolution is strong and getting stronger daily. The DNA that you mention is ever changing, which supports evolution. The evidence for the Biblical account of a Creator is non-existent. I conclude that the world, and the Universe, are self-existent. Del