SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kimberley who wrote (25879)11/13/1997 4:07:00 PM
From: Tritone_ch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
close 6 31/32 size 99 x 10

You little dreamer <vbg>

Alex



To: kimberley who wrote (25879)11/13/1997 4:08:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Respond to of 35569
 
I would guess the shortie MM's were the ones with the low ask at the end. Probably doing everything they could to keep it below $6, even though the bid was bumping the ask.



To: kimberley who wrote (25879)11/13/1997 4:08:00 PM
From: Bruce McGaughey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
Robert Knight- Kim beat me to it. I was just about to comment on
the bid/ask size. What's your take on a bid size of 99 and ask size of 10 ??


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News