SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (2135)11/14/1997 4:20:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6843
 
Paul, if this is the case then why are they coming out with an L2 cacheless version of the Pentium II? I think that the answer is that they're doing it to compete with those 6x86MX and K6 devices that run at 200 mhz or less. The cacheless Pentium II is probably cheaper to produce (smaller die size) and it gives Intel the advantage of transitioning the market to its proprietary Slot architecture. The point is that these chips will certainly be priced less than Pentium II 233 w/cache, and probably at or around the same price point as a K6 or Cyrix chip at the same speed grade.

Of course, the K6 or Cyrix chip will still probably be faster than the cacheless Pentium II.

Kevin



To: Paul Engel who wrote (2135)11/14/1997 5:20:00 PM
From: James Yu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6843
 
Paul,
If Intel can sell Pentium II 233 at or below $90 a piece in first half of 1998, I agree with you - the market probably will accept them for workstations(Pentium 200 for server). Can Intel do it? From Intel's x86 records, when its chips price dropped below $90, Intel got rid of them. But from AMD's record, AMD can sell and make profit at low price below $90. Why the users don't buy competitors' low price below $90 CPUs?

Best wishes

James