SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (25951)11/14/1997 8:28:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1582681
 
Paul; If V was just to fine tune AMD to competency, perhaps they will simply follow the leader from now on.
I think that V would have stayed had he been fully content. He is just nice enough to not strike back at AMD.
How to assess AMD future with no V?

Bill



To: Paul Engel who wrote (25951)11/15/1997 12:42:00 PM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1582681
 
Paul,

Acutally your timeline is a little wrong, the nx5x86 went on to be the K5, the original K5 was remained the K5x86 (or something along those lines)..

At least that what I THINK happened, I could be wrong.. that was so long ago in CPU terms ;-)

Steve

Cyrix Rules!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News