Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (424179)	4/29/2011 2:01:03 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794375

Oh boy. I am sorry to see that analysis. Looks like we are "off to the races" with Obama's BC.

To: Carolyn who wrote (424179)	4/29/2011 2:54:22 PM
From: DMaA	1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 794375

Let me try it one more time. I'm just referring to the information presented in the video linked by Tom. Message 27341135 According to the presenter, (from 0:35 until 3:30) there are two separate PDFs. The one everyone is focusing on that has clearly and outrageously been tampered with. But there is a second one that has not been. According to the presenter there is no sign of tampering on that one. And the information on both the PDFs are essentially the same. So I don't understand the point of dissecting the dirty PDF when there is also a clean one available. Yes, it is granted that the WH version has been messed with. But so what?