Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (424187)	4/29/2011 2:56:20 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794386

WH version has been messed with. But so what? For the WH to put up a phony one destroys them.

To: DMaA who wrote (424187)	4/29/2011 3:20:31 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	9 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794386

so what? because the fucker in chief said in a news conference it was an original? This case is about whether a sitting President presented an altered - that is, forged - document to the American public and claimed it was authentic. You cannot at the same time have Hawaii state that they made two PHOTOCOPIES of an original in a book and then have the White House and AP release "scanned" copies of that document which appear to have been printed on entirely-different paper, never mind that one of them is clearly not a simple scan. market-ticker.org

To: DMaA who wrote (424187)	4/29/2011 4:32:04 PM
From: Carolyn	2 Recommendations Respond to of 794386

Check this out: Message 27343502

To: DMaA who wrote (424187)	4/30/2011 10:47:04 AM
From: Alan Smithee	Respond to of 794386

"But there is a second one that has not been. According to the presenter there is no sign of tampering on that one. And the information on both the PDFs are essentially the same. So I don't understand the point of dissecting the dirty PDF when there is also a clean one available. Yes, it is granted that the WH version has been messed with. But so what?" I create PDFs every week. Usually by way of a scan., but you can also create one by selecting Adobe as a printer. What about the scenario that the multi-layer, manipulated PDF is the starting point and the second file was created by printing the manipulated version to create a new PDF?