Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Char who wrote (26401)	11/15/1997 9:56:00 AM
From: Klaus Brandt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Hi Dave & All The history shows that the fire assays did not show any gold, but the recovery did. Now they have a (consistant, I hope) fire assay. The fire assay does not tell us how much can actually be recovered. IPM needs a consistant fire assay to assess the property because it can be used as a scaler. Let's say, .014 fire assay, .40 recovery - what's the actual scale between the fire assay and recovery? Almost everyone assumes that the fire assay is the actual ore deposit. Read the T Hoare report again. The consistant fire assay is a milestone and a plus, we'll just have to wait for further PR's which I feel will be VERY positive! I liked the report, but not the reaction of the many posters here. We have to wait for the recovery report, which will be more like the AGM annoucement. Klaus