Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Albert V who wrote (26623)	11/16/1997 1:59:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

SFA on a modified basis is the key. RE:<<..think maxxam has only stated it has numbers in the same range as now being reported by IPM? They are just to the south of Ipm aren't they?..>> South of IPM, yeah...about an hour drive..lookatamap. Sixty miles as the Crow flies..from I-10 at IPM to south of Gila Bend where Maxamgold's P-7 is...where they had released the 0.04 OPT numbers( the other locations of Maxam had NOT released SFA numbers ..yet!) Tank on monday, if you sell it will go up, if you hold it will tank...is that what you think? Nuts. Chucaupt2(theytsaidthePTwasthere)

To: Albert V who wrote (26623)	11/16/1997 4:42:00 AM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Albert, Doubt that you are responding to my post to EC but will give it a shot. #25587 is not from CC, it's from Joe to Anne, so I start at a disadvantage :) From the bottom: -Maxam #s weren't from their contiguous property. -I may well be nuts. -Sure you can sue. -Not that obvious to me. -I also wonder about lycopodium and BD, but liquor sooothes me. -yada, yada, yada. Commented on BD vs. current COC to Furry probably 100 posts ago--COC was weak except for the doc they were said to have filed with AZ. AnswerManBob