SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (26746)11/16/1997 4:04:00 PM
From: Brander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Ron

<<This basin is a placer deposit and the consensus has always been that it was
homogeneous>> That was one of my questions, too. Previously, there was alot of talk about the entire basin being homogeneous. Are you now saying that it is not? If it is homogeneous, then the two COC samples should be representative. Another question about the sample size. I agreee that the sample size is small, but statistics would still conclude that it is more likely that at least one of the samples is representataive of the ave amount of Au present than not. I don't see how a respected company like Bateman or BD could take two samples from the site that were entirely unreprentative of the site as a whole?

Brad



To: Ron Struthers who wrote (26746)11/16/1997 4:10:00 PM
From: Donald Watson, Jr.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Ron, when we are talking about paying Auric millions of dollars, is this for there method? Or is it for them to sign off at these numbers? Am I correct in assuming that Auric came up with a method for getting the big numbers and IPM was not willing to pay the long dollar for there info. Can we assume that Batemen could come up with a fire assay to match there numbers but are more interested in the technique (NEW) that IPM is developing. And will In My Humble Opinion be using when it comes time for Recovery

I think Im seeing a bigger picture (Political) here unfolding.

Your Friend,

Don Watson



To: Ron Struthers who wrote (26746)11/16/1997 4:39:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
Ron, There was word earlier of an afternoon Q&A session on the IPM web site. Nothing as of 5:30--have you heard anything?

Still amazed by the 5.75% interest rate you say the PP will carry. The PR BTW says 'they are finalizing a PP...for up to $10M'--have you by now definite word that it is a done deal or the final amount?

TIA, Bob


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News