SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: skinowski who wrote (432765)6/22/2011 10:51:57 AM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794481
 
Agreed... I've never believed poor lifestyle leading to early death costs the government money in the long run.

* * *



To: skinowski who wrote (432765)6/22/2011 12:18:54 PM
From: MJ5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794481
 
Nor to control people's lives-------if you are happy being fat, so be it.

If you are happy being skinny so be it.

Ms Sebilius just stay out of my pantry and kitchen.

Let's see today I can eat dandelion greens. Tomorrow I can eat one or two berries------hmm oh my add a little tofu that causes me to break out in hives.

Now, no steak that provides protein.

Oh my only 1 egg a week----chicken farmers do you here that.

I wish I could live long enough to see what Ms Sebelius dies of what disease because she ate the wrong foods.

Gee how did my Great Grandfather live to be 95 without the government telling him what to eat.

etc.



To: skinowski who wrote (432765)6/22/2011 11:53:16 PM
From: Nadine Carroll6 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 794481
 
Unless I'm missing something, and I don't think I am, all those presumed savings are a great example of Innumeracy. What would happen is that - at a great cost and effort - we would increase the average life expectancy, say, by another 6 months or maybe longer. The result would be a larger older population -- and that cannot possibly be a money saver

If the population was healthier, it might be a wash.

But please, Ms. Sebelius, do continue to point out that once the Federal government controls our healthcare, they will feel entitled to control us from birth to death. What we eat, what we drink, what we do, what drugs or medicines we consume, everything. They figure if they pay for the healthcare, they get the last word.



To: skinowski who wrote (432765)6/23/2011 7:08:40 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 794481
 
There certainly shouldn't be any coercion toward a healthy lifestyle, the government has been wrong many times when it comes to nutrition. What would be the next step, compulsory vaccinations?