Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (433118)	6/26/2011 7:22:32 AM
From: LindyBill	6 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 794268

What Rolling Stone pointed out is the best way for the Left to attack Bachmann. The same way they went after Palin. Her Evangelicalism. The Secular's dislike Christians. But they REALLY dislike Evangelicals. "Stupid snake handlers," is about the best they will say about them. I would like to see the religious breakout on "independents." I suspect they are highly secular. Israel's best friends in this country are Evangelicals. Yet American Jews in particular really dislike them. Ironic.

To: KLP who wrote (433118)	6/26/2011 8:52:01 AM
From: Sr K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794268

The Controversy and confrontation section at en.wikipedia.org includes In June 2011, Rolling Stone editor Eric Bates admitted to deleting several attributions to another reporters work Taibbi had included in an article on presidential candidate Michele Bachmann. Taibbi's article relied heavily on the reporting of G.R. Anderson Jr. of City Pages, Taibbi said, but his executive editor Eric Bates removed them citing "space concerns". The online copy of the article was amended to include reference to Anderson's research. Anderson regarded the incident as neither controversial or as a case of plagiarism.[19]