Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steady_on who wrote (8689)	7/7/2011 12:30:21 PM
From: SteveF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

Sounds like the genuine article to me. We will know in 2 to 3 years when the patent process is completed. LOLOL!!!! Does it seem like 11 months since you posted this? siliconinvestor.com Steady_T Member Profile Steady_T Member Level Share Monday, August 30, 2010 11:16:30 AM Re: tykundegex post# 68275 Post # of 117936 True story. Permit granted in the next couple of weeks. Fuel sales shortly thereafter. Production. Additional processors on line. More production. No coal required for the process like Zadgaonkar's. Higher percentage of oil recovered. No additional refining required, only a separation step. By the way did you notice on Zadgaonkar's web site that for every 1000 ml of "crude oil" 700 ml of fuel is produced. What is the other 300 ml and how do they dispose of it?

To: Steady_on who wrote (8689)	7/7/2011 12:38:41 PM
From: SteveF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

In conversations with officers at the AGM, they discussed the patent applications and described that there would be process patents and specific hardware patents. The last filing by JBII (10Q) says that patents are no guarantee and essentially not in their plans beyond initial application. "We plan to rely on a combination of copyright, trade secret, trademark laws and non-disclosure and other contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights." "We do not know whether any of our patent applications, once made, will result in the issuance of any patents. Even if patents are issued, they may not be sufficient to protect our technology or processes." sec.gov That wasn't very nice of those JBII officers to share non-public material information with the attendees of the AGM and then withhold all video. That gives you guys a pretty big advantage over the rest of us! RegFD, anyone? Don't worry though, Honest John refusing to release the AGM footage while keeping last year's available on his web site leads most of us to doubt whether much of a meeting was even held at all. 500 attendees, huh? There were no shortage of pictures last year...