Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (34805)	7/13/2011 7:16:43 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

> Hansen is making changes over time to bring the historical records into line with what he WANTS them to be. This is pure nonsense. This data is peer reviewed. The blogs are not. There's no impropriety in what he's done. >He should be fired and investigated for possible criminal activity. In your opinion, which is not worth much.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (34805)	7/13/2011 7:53:59 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36917

Here's a 2007 article, published and peer reviewed pubs.giss.nasa.gov Consult section 2 BACKGROUND OF GISS ANALYSIS METHOD, outlining all the corrections they made to the temperature record. There was a lot done... Some of the corrections were due to spatial distribution of the temperature stations, etc. I suggest you read through it and report back to us on any anomalies. 1000's of scientists have read it and none of them have come up with anything. IMO, you are WAY OVER YOUR HEAD