Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (108130)	7/19/2011 8:53:39 AM
From: MJ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224887

Cain sounds tough. However, what are his conditions with Israel. "Mr. Cain said that, as commander-in-chief, he would “make it crystal clear [that] if you mess with Israel, you’re messing with the United States of America,” but stressed that his “Cain Doctrine” would not be a “blank check” for Israeli military action. “There will be a set of conditions and circumstances that I will work with Israel on for them to understand that they cannot abuse that doctrine,” said Mr. Cain, a former CEO of Godfather’s Pizza." What would Cain do if Israel decided to take independent action against Iran? Would Cain protect American interests and side with Israel? What is the "Cain Doctrine"------? As for this voter and writer don't tell me that you have a "Doctrine" and not be specific----------seems to me that Cain is hedging first he says he will do this and then he says oh by the way I have conditions. I do agree that Iran understands that Obama is a lame duck President, titular President, and they will test him continuously. The challenge between now and the 2012 elections is to keep Obama from dealing with Iran and assuring the destruction of Israel and a major WWIII.