SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elsewhere who wrote (437634)7/28/2011 12:29:00 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793850
 
pump up the water when there's a surplus of power feeding and release it later.

Actually I was thinking about that as I posted. However, that is not an option in the flat arid desert where the sun shins the brightest.

PV can be a useful part of the renewable mix, together with wind and hydro. Every little bit helps.

I think that's reasonable.



To: Elsewhere who wrote (437634)7/28/2011 1:16:13 PM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793850
 
Just as the same computing power becomes cheaper every year ("Moore's Law") the production costs of PV modules drop to lower and lower levels.

Moore's law is about densities doubling i.e. compute power, not costs of the product to consumers.

Solar is all about the cheapest manufacturing cost as possible and of course the Sun provides only so much energy per square foot no matter how efficient the collector.



To: Elsewhere who wrote (437634)7/28/2011 1:47:05 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 793850
 
<<Hydro power can already be used now - pump up the water when there's a surplus of power feeding and release it later.>>

Tried that at a nuke plant on Lake Michigan. Pumps killed a few fish so the EPA shut it down.