SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lalit Jain who wrote (5690)11/18/1997 2:54:00 AM
From: sh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Lalit Jain:

I think "unprofessional" is putting it extremely lightly. He points to no facts justifying his decision to recommend a sell off of Naxos shares. All he does is cast aspersions on Naxos' management (clearly the result of his encounter with the younger John) and tells his followers that he will give them more information on his IMMEDIATE sell recommendation in DECEMBER! He does mention a specific sell price, $7.50. He says there is very little reliable data on Naxos as compared to IPM. IPM's independent consultants have released only a few results and they are undeniably dismal -- most less than .05 opt gold, the highest one .07. Naxos has had over .4 opt of gold verified by Ledoux on the ASE's COC ore. If IPM's 121 COC samples (which he mentions) were any good, the company would have not held back in testing and releasing the information on them IMHO.

Mr. Taylor is clearly a frustrated man. Naxos did not give him the royal treatment he felt he deserved during his infamous visit, he put his faith in another company (IPM), he's lost big and now he's compounding the situation by asking his subscribers to blindly follow him in selling Naxos shares and (astonishingly) buying IPM's. Any rational person should find that suspicious. If he cannot explain now why Naxos is no longer an attractive company (contrary to his vocal positive opinion of Naxos prior to the Greg John encounter) -- especially since he was recommending people sell it today and particularly since nothing but positive things have been happening with the company since his Greg John encounter -- he deservedly appears as nothing but a foolishly ego driven man who has no problem in casting aside the interests of persons who honestly rely on him for wise and informed advice.

I hope he did sell his shares today; however, I pity those of his subscribers who blindly followed him and did likewise. Naxos is certainly no sure bet but given its confirmed results to date it is by far the best "desert dirt" on the market. If the COC results come out favorably as indicated in the August release, its potential is phenomenal. Under such circumstances, a sell recommendation in favor of IPM shares is absurd. I seriously doubt Mr. Taylor has any information indicating that Naxos is getting poor results, as Doug Meetmer expressed fear of earlier today. Mr. Taylor says absolutely nothing in his newsletter to suggest this.

Only time will tell whether Mr. Taylor's lousy advice under the circumstances will benefit those who blindly followed it. However, either way, the recommendation deserves nothing but ridicule under the circumstances.

I apologize for the long-winded post but this was really something surprisingly asinine from this particular analyst.

Regards,

sh



To: Lalit Jain who wrote (5690)11/18/1997 8:39:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Lalit, <<months ago he was positive on Naxos>> Jay has been sour on Naxos for a few months now. He has openly complained about management many times. I must say that the recent intense recommendation suggests that there is much more to this than we know. He also hurt the company that he consults (CHIP) with his comments. He is now trying to damage control his outburst IMO. People should speculate more about the "why" than the superficially apparent reasons. Some items to speculate on: Since Jay is a consultant to CHIP, did Naxos blow some deal he engineered? Did Jay get into Grandish's multiple personality medication? Did Jay find a serious problem that could also hurt CHIP and used Naxos management as a goat? Does he know something about the playas were there is nothing to support the current Naxos market cap? etc.? etc.? I suspect that one of you smart guys can find the truth if you dig awhile.



To: Lalit Jain who wrote (5690)11/18/1997 4:39:00 PM
From: GlobalMarine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Lalit, Jay recommended IPM and the stock tanked to $2. So there's no overwhelming reason to believe that he is right about his sell reco. He may be right or wrong, who knows. The IPM debacle du jour taught us that we really don't know what's going on with all these desert dirts, and I diversified across the lot for that reason.

Rand