Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Creative Labs (CREAF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (5867)	11/18/1997 10:43:00 AM
From: CHIP HUNTER	Respond to of 13925

Nope Jon CREAF in my opinion based on chart pattern is going alot lower.... There if it doesn't go below 26 3/4 I'm wrong Jon, this is calling it before the fact. Jon one more question why would you buy AAPL when you told me that it looked like it was going down?? I hope your still not holding it doesn't look good right now... You see timing is everything when your a trader Jon. Good luck Jon

To: Jon Tara who wrote (5867)	11/18/1997 10:59:00 AM
From: Dennis G.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13925

If this is selling because of disappointment in yesterday's announcements, how come it didn't gap down to this level? Why did it just sort of roll over and fall after the opening? How much more "news" premium is left in the price, do you think? And how can you tell that it's not caused by the patent issue? Dennis

To: Jon Tara who wrote (5867)	11/18/1997 11:33:00 PM
From: CJay	Respond to of 13925

Jon: How dare you wax skeptical about the greatest market timer of ours or any other time? Like Chip said, in his own humble words, (read his earlier post) nobody can time the top all the time, not even someone as great as himself (or words to that effect). You are right, we will get some after the fact claim of closing his short at the bottom--but in this case, Chip also forgot to tell us he even went short. He has been talking about it since the stock went to 26 and beyond (about two weeks ago) but I don't recall him saying he had gone short for sure or at what price. I might have missed it, but if he did not disclose it, he can give us an after the fact doubleheader---opening and closing his position. CJay PS--its pretty obvious by now he only posts to get a rise out of somebody--we should all just ignore him.