Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (110152)	8/8/2011 5:40:39 PM
From: FJB	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224729

Are you aware that Obama and cronies are calling tax-paying Americans terrorists? At the same time, Obama and cronies are unable to call a man who killed 14 US service men while screaming "Allahu Akbar!" a terrorist. Do you agree with whom Obama has identified as "terrorists"? Do you think calling tax paying, law abiding Americans terrorists is appropriate?

To: Paul V. who wrote (110152)	8/8/2011 5:56:23 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	7 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

But, calmer voices and a problem-solving approach must prevail. I'm sure that you were spouting this whole calmer, work together, sane, problem solving approach as Obama, Pelosi and Reid were jamming their crap down our collective throats when the democrats had both the house and senate. I'm sure you voiced your outrage when the SEIU thugs were beating up merchants and when ACORN was protesting at the homes of bank executives. You trained and worked with these people, right? Guess what, saner people will prevail. They are waking up and they are pissed off. And being pissed off doesn't make one insane. It is time to drive a stake through the heart of the progressive movement. And if Alinsky tactics are needed to do it, well, all is fair in love and war, eh? But, many individuals are not adverse to physical violence when their self-interest or livelihood is threatened. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs come into play. The huge masses can overwhelm the legal system and then threaten our Republic. Why do you think that the Tea Party came into existence? It's because the PROGRESSIVE PARASITES are threatening the livilihood of hard working Americans. Face it, the PROGRESSIVE PARASITES have abused the power they had. They should have given up the Alinsky crap 3.5 years ago. And now that it is being used against them, they are crying "foul". Progressives are a bunch of hypocrites. The biggest mistake that conservatives can do is to stop the process of burying the progressive movement until the progressives tap out and get out of American politics. Until then, I pray we don't waste this crisis. ...oh, and I love how you use that sane voice when you point out that individuals will resort to physical violence when their self interest and livelihood are threatened. You use a nice calm voice while pointing out that there is potential violence. I'll tell ya what, threatening my livelihood is a passive-aggressive form of violence. Let's see how objective you are, in the past 3 years, who do you think has dominated the media with messages of hate and violence? Is it the hateful racist tea party extremists? or is it the loving and warm progressives who just want to save the world?