To: Bill Ounce who wrote (472 ) 11/18/1997 1:26:00 PM From: STLMD Respond to of 9818
Bill, here's an expanded version of this in the NYTimes today. Written by Saul Hansell a reporter I have contacted re the Y2k problem, especially embedded chips: Georgia Bankers in Hot Millennium Water By SAUL HANSELL NEW YORK -- In the first of what could become a series of tough actions against banks whose computers are not ready to handle dates beyond 1999, federal and state regulators severely reprimanded a small Georgia banking company Monday for having inadequate computer systems. The Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance all issued cease-and-desist orders against the company, the Putnam-Greene Financial Corp., which is based in Eatonton, Ga., and has $200 million in assets. Earlier this year, balances were not updated for a full week because of problems with its computers. After an investigation, regulators ordered the company to begin following a wide range of prudent computer practices. In particular, they referred to the company's apparent lack of preparation for problems that are expected in computer programs that have not been modified to process dates after Jan. 1, 2000. In a cease-and-desist order -- one of the harshest reprimands regulators can hand out before levying penalties -- Putnam-Greene was told to end a long list of practices that included operating "with inadequate and unreliable electronic information systems." It was also ordered to upgrade its systems and insure proper backup and disaster recovery policies. Putnam-Greene officials said they had already addressed the most serious problems and were at work on the remaining issues. Because of short cuts taken in the past by software programmers throughout the computer world, many systems still in use can read only the last two digits of the year -- "75," for example, instead of 1975. If not corrected through a painstaking process, the software in such computers will read the "00" in 2000 as the year 1900, resulting in all sorts of miscalculations. This problem could be especially disruptive for the banking industry, which has spent billions of dollars to enable its computers to handle dates in the new millennium. Most major U.S. banks are expected to be prepared to enter the next century, but experts say many foreign banks and smaller ones in this country are so far behind that many risk grinding to a halt. Banking experts said that by using the harsh penalty of a cease-and-desist order, the regulators were sending a message. "If you were on a board of directors of a bank, you would have to be brain dead at this point not to realize the regulators are very much concerned about this issue," said H. Rogdin Cohen, a top banking lawyer with the New York firm of Sullivan & Cromwell. The banking authorities have set a strict schedule for financial institutions to prepare their computers by next year so that all the systems can be tested in 1999. The regulators expect to examine each institution by the middle of next year to see if they are meeting the schedule. Regulators say that as those examinations are complete, sanctions like the cease-and-desist orders will be announced against institutions that are seriously lagging. "We don't anticipate a large number of enforcement actions," said Michael Zamorski, the deputy director of bank supervision at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. "But we will not hesitate to use them if other means are unsuccessful in obtaining the required redemption for the year 2000 problems." A recent survey by the Gartner Group, a Stamford, Conn., consulting and research company, found that only 30 percent of small banks in the United States had completed one quarter of the work necessary to have their systems ready for the year 2000. By contrast, 90 percent of big banks have reached the quarter-way mark. At Putnam-Greene, the weeklong computer problem led regulators to conduct a full audit of the banking company's computer system. "Looking back, this was a blessing in disguise," said Joe P. Hudson, the executive vice president of the Farmers and Merchants Bank, the largest of Putnam-Greene's three banks. "They said 'Look, you all need a new computer,' " he said. "And we agreed and got on the ball." He also said the banking company had already bought and installed a new computer system that it says will work with dates past 2000. But the regulators worry that some small banks will rely too heavily on solutions promised by a variety of consultants and software companies offering remedies to the year 2000 problem. "Institutions are putting undue reliance on statements that everything will be OK from the service providers," Zamorski said. While some small banks will spend the money to upgrade their computer systems, others are simply choosing to sell themselves, passing the expense on to bigger acquirers. "A lot of banks, looking at what it is going to cost them to be 2000 compliant -- if they can get there at all -- will say this is a good time to sell," Cohen said. Copyright 1997 The New York Times