SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (119)8/30/2011 11:24:57 AM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
The excesses you sight are the loop holes to close. Perhaps the AMT is the mechanism. As for a war on business - I agree re the bailouts. How do you describe Obama's war - and I mean war - against hydrocarbon producers?



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (119)8/30/2011 11:25:07 AM
From: Sdgla1 Recommendation  Respond to of 85487
 
Steve,

The first step was made when the TP elected the new members in the house and nearly did the same in the senate.

The next step will be to elect a POTUS that has a proven record of fiscal, pro business growth, sanity.

Gov Perry meets those requirements.

Nothing will change until that happens... IMO.

S



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (119)8/30/2011 11:33:13 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 85487
 
Obama Admin Adds 608 New Regulations in July!








Many House and Senate conservatives are reviving their battle against federal regulations, claiming that the president hasn’t stopped issuing job-killing rules during the debt ceiling fight. “While Washington and Americans have been focused on the debt ceiling, the Obama administration has continued to roll out more crushing red tape,” said a spokesperson for Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso, who’s been championing the regulation fight.

At Tuesday’s GOP Senate caucus lunch, the lawmakers said that they will renew their efforts, supported by business groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In a memo Barasso handed out to the lawmakers, he claimed that the administration in July only has put in $9.5 billion in new regulatory costs by proposing 229 new rules and finalizing 379 rules. Among those he cited were EPA, healthcare reform, and financial regulatory reform rules.

Post Continues on www.usnews.com



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (119)8/30/2011 11:34:23 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 85487
 

GOP Challenges White House on Planned Spike in Costly New Job-Crushing Regulations
Posted by Katie Boyd on August 26, 2011
Today, House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) sent a letter to the White House calling on President Obama to disclose all planned regulatory actions by the Administration that would have an economic impact of $1 billion or more. As “ economic growth slows to [a] crawl” and the “ job market still looks weak,” it is clear that the economy cannot withstand the barrage of major new federal regulations planned by the Administration. Here are a few key points from Speaker Boehner’s letter:

  • Number of Regulations With Major Economic Impact “Has Spiked Since Last Year.” “What it boils down to is this: The White House is on a tear to remove old, unnecessary regulations from the books, while Republicans in Congress and the business community are much more concerned about new and proposed rules with higher price tags. In his letter, Boehner says the number of planned regulations with a cost of $100 million or more has spiked since last year, from 191 to 219.” ( USA Today, 8/26/11)
  • White House Has Increased Proposed Number of Major Regulations by 15 Percent. “[H]ouse Speaker John A. Boehner fired off a letter blasting President Obama for a 15 percent increase in the number of new rules and demanding cost estimates for some of them by the time Congress returns from break.” ( The Washington Times, 8/26/11)
  • Planned Regulations “Are Overly Aggressive” and “Will Hinder the Economy.” “House Republicans and some Democrats allege that a suite of planned administration rules are overly aggressive and will hinder the economy, especially a number of planned Environmental Protection Agency regulations.” ( The Hill, 8/26/11)
  • Business Community Fears “New Regulations Would Hurt An Already Weak Economy.” “While the administration is pushing to eliminate what it considers to be old and unneeded regulations, Republicans and the business community complain it is not pushing hard enough and fear new regulations would hurt an already weak economy.” ( Reuters, 8/26/11)
  • White House Rhetoric “At Odds With the Reality of Its Regulatory Wishlist.” “Boehner, who argues that the White House’s rhetoric about eliminating regulatory burdens is at odds with the reality of its regulatory wish list, wants the president to identify all regulations that would cause an impact on the economy of $1 billion or more.” ( Politico, 8/26/11)
  • Republicans Plan “Major Offensive Against…Onerous” Regulations. “As Republicans prepare to mount a major offensive against the Obama administration’s onerous regulatory regime, House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) is asking the president to account for all of the regulations imposed by the administration having an estimated economic cost of $1 billion or greater. Boehner made a similar request in August of last year, which the White House ignored.” ( National Review Online, 8/26/11)
Publicly available data show that the Obama Administration’s rhetorical nod to the need for regulatory reform does not match reality. In fact, the Administration has 4,257 new regulations in the pipeline, of which at least 219 will have an economic impact of $100 million or more.

As Speaker Boehner noted in today’s letter, it is critical that the Obama Administration provide a full accounting of its regulatory agenda - as Speaker Boehner requested a year ago - “as the House considers legislation requiring a congressional review and approval of any proposed federal government regulation that will have a significant impact on the economy” (see: REINS Act). The new House majority made a pledge to the American people to stop the red tape factory in Washington as part of an ongoing effort to remove impediments to job creation and economic growth. Learn more about the REINS Act and other solutions Republicans have put forth to help the economy get back to creating private-sector jobs at: jobs.gop.gov.


Post a Comment ( 2 Comments )


Obama Administration’s Own Public Data Show Job-Crushing Regulatory Agenda Set to Increase, Not Decrease
Posted by Speaker Boehner’s Press Office on August 26, 2011
By law, the Executive Branch is required to annually document the number of new regulatory actions it plans for the coming year, and to make this information publicly available. A search of this year’s information, posted online in recent days, reveals that the Obama Administration’s job-crushing regulatory barrage is not being scaled back, but rather expanded, appearing to contradict White House rhetoric this week about President Obama’s intent to reduce the regulatory burden on job creators.

A simple scan of the Obama Administration’s current regulatory agenda indicates that the Administration currently has 4,257 new regulatory actions in the works, of which at least 219 will have an economic impact of $100 million or more. That is an increase of nearly 15 percent over last year, when a similar search showed 191 new economically-significant regulatory actions by the Administration to be in the works. Americans know from the Administration’s own statements that some of these new economically-significant regulations will have an economic impact of tens of billions of dollars. But how many, exactly? The Administration hasn’t said.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) today sent a letter to President Obama noting the scheduled increase in regulatory action by the Administration and asking that the White House provide Congress with a list of all of the regulatory actions it plans that would have an economic impact of $1 billion or more. The Speaker formally requested that the White House provide this information before Congress returns this fall, when the House is scheduled to resume work on legislation promised in the Pledge to America that would require congressional approval for any new regulatory action that is projected to have a significant impact on job creation.

Boehner sent a similar request for information to the president last August, when he was serving as House Republican leader. The requested information was never provided.

Susan E. Dudley, director of the George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center, wrote about the 219 economically-significant regulatory actions planned by the Obama Administration this week in a guest op-ed for POLITICO in which she noted the president’s actions this week are unlikely to have much impact. As Dudley noted:

“The government’s most recent agenda of upcoming regulations (issued in July) does not indicate a slow-down in activity. It does list 4,257 regulatory actions under development — more than 300 more than last year at this time. Of those, 219 are expected to impose costs of $100 million or more — 28 more ‘major’ regulations than were listed by this time last year, and 47 more than in 2009.

“Some activity is required by new legislative mandates — particularly [Dodd-Frank and Obamacare]. Others, including the Environmental Protection Agency’s regulation of greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, are based on new judicial interpretations of statutes passed 20 or more years ago — and don’t necessarily reflect the priorities of any recent Congress. But some are discretionary actions, like EPA’s pending decision to tighten ozone standards. This is likely to slow economic growth in thousands of counties across the nation and impose costs of $20 billion to $90 billion per year, according to the agency’s own estimates.

“The reform efforts detailed in the agencies’ retrospective plans pale in comparison. Reforms that may promise real savings, like the Labor Department’s efforts to streamline some reporting requirements, at best offer paperwork burden reductions valued only in the millions. Other reporting reforms --like replacing paper submissions with electronic reports — might as easily facilitate regulatory enforcement as grant relief. Some agencies’ plans may actually increase uncertainty — like the Council on Environmental Quality’s commitment to periodically review its ‘categorical exclusions.’ These exemptions have traditionally provided potentially affected parties some certainty that projects would not face unexpected regulatory requirements.”

NOTE: You can also check it for yourself. The Obama Administration’s newly-updated regulatory agenda is posted online at reginfo.gov. Right on the front page is a graph showing that 4,257 new regulatory actions are in the works. To dig a bit deeper on that number, one must go to the “Advanced Search” feature on the site, located at reginfo.gov. To reach that search page, go to the “search” box in the upper right corner of the main page, check the “agenda” box, and hit the search button, then click on the “Advanced Search” link that appears on the page that subsequently comes up. From there, check the option marked “Search most current publication only” and hit “continue.” On the next page that comes up, select the option “All,” and hit “continue” again. On the page that comes up, visitors are given the ability to break down the data based on a variety of different criteria. To obtain a list of the regulatory actions currently planned by the Administration that will have an economic impact of $100 million or more, go to the “Priority” options about halfway down the page on the left, and check the box marked “Economically Significant.” Hit the search button at the bottom of the page.


Post a Comment ( 7 Comments )