SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sdgla who wrote (421)9/1/2011 6:27:38 PM
From: koan  Respond to of 85487
 
topics.nytimes.com

Yes, go to this mans web site and he has an explanation and a chart. He was also a nobel prize winning economist and 4th most refenced economist in the world.

In short here is what happened. In 1930 personal debt was very high. FDR asked Keynes what to do. Keynes explained it and things got better. Then in 1937 the Republicans convinced FDR to cut spending to reduce the deficit and things turned down.

Then FDR went back to Keynesian ideas an things got better.

Then on Dec 7, 1941 when Japan attacked us the government funded a monster stimulus (WWII) and we had full employment. No one brought up the deficit then-lol!

Everyone who wanted to work had a job, men and women. So now everyone could pay down their debt, create businesses consume and pay taxes.

By 1950 both individual an government debt was down and the 50's were a time of plenty.

Remember as well, when Clinton raised taxes every single Republican voted against it and said it would cause a depression. Instead we had a boom and created 22 million jobs.

As Krugman said: "we have crunched the numbers.

By the way Stiglitz, also a nobel prize winner is the MOST referenced economist in the world.

They crunched the numbers, but uncle Fred probably does not have the eduction to understand them.



To: Sdgla who wrote (421)9/1/2011 7:16:37 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
Since a trillion dollar stimulus is said to be too small ... how much do these folks think would be big enough? $2 trillion? 3, 4 ... ?