Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (912)	11/18/1997 11:36:00 PM
From: Steven Durrington	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11708

I apoligize for my BLOOPER in yesterday's post. I wrote it at the end of a 10 hour work day, and obviously made an error in my musings. You are entirely correct when you contradicted me to say that CSMA is expecting a minor LOSS this financial year, and NOT a minor profit. Do we both agree however, that the 4th quarter turnaround and future expected growth are both significant points ? Sorry to all about the confusion which emanated from my dusty brain. I was thinking about CSMA turning towards profit and growth, and this came through in my writings. Just goes to show you should try to get verification about what you read here, like Neal does, as people are human, and make mistakes and/or misinterpretations. Now speaking of verification, how are things going with the well upgrade approval.... Neal ? I got a private e-mail from someone overnight who questioned the well's upgrade based on geological considerations. I understand that the EPA has approved the upgrade (please correct me if I'm wrong here), and that it was going to the local authorities for final approval, which is considered almost a formality (correct me again if I'm mis-remembering previous posts). Anyhow, I'd be happier to clarify this issue, and hopefully one of you guys who is closer than 10,000 km away could make a phone call or two ? What are these complaints from investors about "only" being up by 15% today ? Sheeeesh, you can please some of the people some of the time... By the way, where's Franco ? Cheers, Durro

To: TraderGreg who wrote (912)	11/18/1997 11:42:00 PM
From: charles messick	Respond to of 11708

OK, OK,.........so I'm seeing the glass more than half full. AT the same time this little rocket is a unique situation and is in the preasure cooker with the heat on full......... Maybe no one has told our little stock the rules yet. Under control again, Chuck Messick

To: TraderGreg who wrote (912)	11/19/1997 1:49:00 AM
From: franco	Respond to of 11708

Greg- I like your post so much I want to post it again... www4.techstocks.com and again.... www4.techstocks.com and again... www4.techstocks.com Disneyland... it all started with a mouse! C$MA.... it all started with a Cowbot Hat air freshener! Q: Hey, David S, you just made a $1,000,000 on C$MA, watcha gonna do now? A: I'm goin to Disneyland!!! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C$MA!!!! I heard a good joke tonite on the Ask Judy radio sex talk show, which reminded me of C$MA(don't read further if offended): Why are all cowgirls bowlegged? 'Cause all Cowboys eat xxxxx with their HATS ON!

To: TraderGreg who wrote (912)	11/19/1997 2:20:00 AM
From: franco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11708

Hate to be like Columbo again, but there's just one more thing... I like your comparison between ERHC and C$MA. The way I look at it is that C$MA is ERHC PLUS a short squeeze. ERHC was @ $2.5 and goin UP, BUT for ONE DAY it dipped to $1.50 and then continued onward and upward to $5. Although I'm not expecting it, I would'nt be SURPRISED if some volatility breaks out in C$MA, given Shortys BIG COVERING PROBLEM! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO C$MA!!!

To: TraderGreg who wrote (912)	11/19/1997 10:55:00 AM
From: charles messick	Respond to of 11708

TraderGreg,, To follow the logic you presented in post #912, "" As of today, notwithstanding the fact that stock pulled back off its morning highs, we have added 800,000 (1.6MM shares/2 since OTC and NASDAQ count both buys and sells and I'm assuming minimal inventory) shares at levels $2.19 and above. Coupling this with our elite cadre of strong longs and it indicates an upward pressure on the price. The new buyers of today aren't planning to sell at a loss, right?"" It makes sence that this will help make this a much more stable stock in the comming days. much stronger hands in at a higher average. A higher need and expectation for stock prices. Should make us all a bit more comfortable with the climbing prices. Chuck Messick