Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (19722)	11/18/1997 10:42:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Every Shareholder of RMIL Please send email to confirm these 4 questions and to be added to my list. I started a complete recount yesterday to grab an exact number from all shareholders. Everyone will be given an official number and my list will still be confidential! Power to the RMIL Shareholder value cartel! Send to: RMIL-ALL-Share@psicop.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL RMIL shares owned: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total RMIL shares called in name form (including received cert's.): --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total RMIL shares received in certificate form: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total IRA Shares owned:

To: Ellen who wrote (19722)	11/18/1997 10:44:00 PM
From: KMT	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Ellen: Thanks for reposting Hraka's post. Q7) How many shares of the current outsatnding 3.4 million are restricted? A7) Roland is working on collecting all data concerning the number of shares in the public float. We will give these numbers out as soon as we know. The number of 144 shares John got today from Morgan was particularly vague and substantially lower than the number RG/you posted. I have two questions regarding this. 1) Other then MK's explanation, what do you attribute the large difference to? 2) Why does a company that's supposedly trying to stop someone from naked shorting it and is supposed to be supportive of the cartel's efforts not have the exact number of 144 stock on the tip of their tongue? (Especially since that is a very significant number in determining whether or not a squeeze is possible.) Cheers, KMT