Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (203648)	9/13/2011 10:57:02 AM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 312889

Those are good points about east/west pipelines, but I'm not holding my breath either ...

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (203648)	9/13/2011 11:17:43 AM
From: kidl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312889

I think the Keystone pipeline will become reality. The US needs the jobs and the Gulf Coast refiners need the oil. Canadian east / west oil traffic could be handled by rail. cn.ca

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (203648)	9/13/2011 3:45:56 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312889

su.to - Suncor is pretty established in the oil sands, it's actually the bright spot to their operations, no problem getting product to market, that's for new entrants ... possibly for their continued expansions yes to a degree, but far bigger negatives recently have been in their conventional and offshore ops ... Libya Syria and way off Newfielandia, they sure do pick em eh ... under the whole thing though are many decades of secure reserves in what is considered, relatively speaking in the manner of this quaint species, a stable political jurisdiction, and that imho merits a premium it's not getting now Pipelines to both side oceans yes, and what about one to the top ocean as well, at Churchill