Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (157016)	9/14/2011 4:36:50 PM
From: Sweet Ol	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206093

BC, why is syncrude not a pollutant? Is it so heavy it won't go anyplace if it spills? Blessings, JRH

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (157016)	9/14/2011 4:47:12 PM
From: t4texas	Respond to of 206093

bearcatbob, the epa's environmental impact report was out last week sometime. i posted it on bdbbr at the time, and it said the planned route of the keystone xl was better than any of the five or seven other routes the epa experts studied. they mentioned some of the other pipelines that already run over the ogalalla in nebraska, and they noted the keystone xl would be much higher technical standards and safer than what is already in the ground over the aquifer.