SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (79612)9/14/2011 10:02:09 PM
From: arun gera  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218860
 
Isn't the market rent already taking account in an amortized fashion the return on the assets built over 100 years? Thank the migrants for increasing demand for the older resident's assets and services.

In american cities, white flight in 1970s resulted in abandoning of the 200 years of assets in the large cities. New immigrants in 1980s and 1990s brought vitality back. The cities with fewer immigrant populations (like Cleveland) remain dead.

> If they rent a place in Vector's area and get an electricity account, one day they get a cheque in the mail. "Huh? What's this?" They have contributed nothing to building the electricity network but they score the value of the assets built up over 100 years. "Hmmm... NZ good place. Me like.">



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (79612)9/14/2011 10:33:07 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218860
 
Putting personal assets into corporate form affects none of that.

Ah,.. understand your view much better now on tradeable citizenship. And I find many things I agree with..

Would be a wonderful concept.. Maybe we should all start a fund for the purpose of buying a chunk of land somewhere and make our own country.. ;)

I vote for some nice pacific island with an excellent lagoon, and coral reef..

Hawk



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (79612)9/14/2011 11:39:06 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218860
 
Mq,

A few questions..

1) 10k to 20K annually what about the rest of the population or do current citizens automatically get one ?
2) what about minors, do kids get one if their parents have one... (guessing no... has to be bought and if at age of majority one cannot be afforded... what consequence ?)
3) who decides how the proceeds will be spent .. the folks in charge now ? If they are doing a poor job now won't they waste yet again ?
4) good idea for having skin in the game but had to get the ball rolling ?

TBS



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (79612)4/22/2012 7:00:40 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218860
 
"The point of Tradable Citizenship is to personally own the assets of the state."

Under socialism, you're always free to stay within the system, and are not burdened by the opportunity to change it, since it is already an ideal form.

All seek to enter it and none seek to escpe it (particularly since theyre not free to leave it).

The Dream of Leaving Cuba

By YOANI SANCHEZ Published: April 21, 2012

Havana

OUTSIDE the sun is blindingly hot, and in the immigration office 100 people are sweating profusely. But no one complains. A critical word, a demanding attitude, could end in punishment. So we all wait silently for a “white card,” authorization to travel outside Cuba.

The white card is a piece of the migratory absurdities that prevent Cubans from freely leaving and entering their own country. It is our own Berlin Wall without the concrete, the land-mining of our borders without explosives. A wall made of paperwork and stamps, overseen by the grim stares of soldiers. This capricious exit permit costs over $200, a year’s salary for the average Cuban. But money is not enough. Nor is a valid passport. We must also meet other, unwritten requirements, ideological and political conditions that make us eligible, or not, to board a plane.

With so many obstacles, receiving a “yes” is like hearing the screech of the bolts pulled back on a cell door. But for many, like me, the answer is always “no.” Thousands of Cubans have been condemned to immobility on this island, though no court has issued such a verdict. Our “crime” is thinking critically of the government, being a member of an opposition group or subscribing to a platform in defense of human rights.

In my case, I can flaunt the sad record of having received 19 denials since 2008 of my applications for a white card. I left an empty chair at every conference, every award ceremony, every presentation of my books. I never received any explanation, only the laconic phrase “For now, you are not authorized to leave the country.”

But it is not only dissidents or critics who suffer these mobility restrictions. Hundreds of doctors, nurses and health professionals whom the government values too much to risk losing know that choosing those professions means they will save lives but will be unlikely to see other latitudes. They have seen their families separated, their children go into exile, while they wait for the authorities’ approval to leave. Some wait three years, five years, a decade, forever.

The blacklist of those who cannot cross the sea is long, and though the information is never published, we all know how the system works. And so we don masks of conformity before the watchful eyes of the state, hoping to achieve the cherished dream of crossing national boundaries. The exit permit thus becomes a method of ideological control.

A few days ago Ricardo Alarcón, president of the Cuban Parliament, told a foreign interviewer that the government is studying a radical reform of emigration. But we all know how the Cuban government utilizes the euphemism “we are studying” to buy time in what could become a wait of decades.

In reality, these same authorities are unwilling to give up this rich industry that brings them millions of dollars a year in fees for entering and leaving the country. The rumors fly but the locks never open.

A year ago, for example, as I was applying for permission to attend an event in Spain, the news “broke” that Cubans would soon travel freely. When I asked the official handling my request if it was true, she sneered at me, “Go to the airport and see if they let you leave without a white card.”

That same afternoon, as I was issued one more denial, my cellphone rang insistently in my pocket. A broken voice related to me the last moments in the life of Juan Wilfredo Soto, a dissident who died several days after being handcuffed and beaten by the police in a public park. I sat down to steady myself, my ears ringing, my face flush.

I went home and looked at my passport, full of visas to enter a dozen countries but lacking any authorization to leave my own. Next to its blue cover my husband placed a report of the details of Juan Wilfredo Soto’s death. Looking from his face in the photograph to the national seal on my passport, I could only conclude that in Cuba, nothing has changed. We remain in the grip of the same limitations, caught between the high walls of ideological sectarianism and the tight shackles of travel restrictions.

Yoani Sanchez is the author of “Havana Real: One Woman Fights to Tell the Truth About Cuba Today.” This article was translated by Mary Jo Porter from the Spanish.

nytimes.com