SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (2618)9/22/2011 8:51:35 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 85487
 
"we know very little about the causes of climate change"

Wrong. We know a lot about the causes of both NAGW and AGW.
Living in the test tube of the latter, we are learning more about the effects of the latter every year.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (2618)9/22/2011 10:23:46 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
There is NO other reason to think that the minor warming (approx. 0.75 degrees C) we have seen in the last 150 years is anything but natural variability, a slow continued exit from the Little Ice Age.

And there are cycles within cycles. Where much of the nominal warming in the past 150 years can be attributed to rebounding out of the LIA, there is the larger glacial/interglacial cycle at work too. And we are at the tail end of an interglacial period. Again, where you would expect some warming and some reduction in polar ice coverage.