Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nixpix who wrote (80415)	9/27/2011 3:35:57 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219162

Look, GS has been listed since last century, not as you claim "a couple of years" <http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=GS+Interactive#symbol=GS;range=my > In 10 years, the share price is not up. The claims you are making seem like unfounded conspiracy theory to me. Yes, I know people who worked there have had various jobs in financial aspects for the USA government. They were employed as technical supporters and advisers. Congress has absolute power and can anything they like [after they roll it through their processes and the president signs it into law and he had best not veto it if public support is there]. The shareholders of GS have total power to order their employees around. There isn't much reason for a company to exist other than to make profits. Of course they try to get benefits from governments if they can, but governments have no obligation to go along with them. Governments need votes. Goldman Sachs has no vote. Mqurice