Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scrapps who wrote (9498)	11/19/1997 3:45:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 22053

No, I'm not saying that, I am saying "the girl" shook the hell out of that child and most likely slammed his head against a hard surface causing a 2" skull fracture. The baby died, she caused his death, I do not give a damn what her motives were. I think the concept of "degrees" of murder are bogus, is the child any less dead because she just wanted to shut him up? I believe the first verdict was correct, she engaged in an overt act that was directly responsible for the death of another human being, when you start letting people plead ignorance regarding the outcome of their behaviour this is what you get. I would have added aggravated assault to the charge. The idea that this fat ass child killer is walking the streets free absolutely incenses me.