Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (11503)	11/19/1997 5:12:00 PM
From: squetch	Respond to of 32384

Fugazi, Fair enough on the labelled and labelling issue. I will make an effort to dig up the links re Henry's background and post them to you here. I think he spoke to this a couple of days ago, in Sept in answers to bap, and prior to that. I am not certain on the last one, but am betting b/c I recalled that much of the info posted to bap had been posted before. If we continue please let me know if you would like me to respond via email or clubhouse to spare the others. Regards, squetch

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (11503)	11/19/1997 5:20:00 PM
From: Russian Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32384

Fugazi, For the record, "I cannot believe that you believe X," can be understood either of two distinct ways: 1. "You believe X, and I find that objectionable." Or, 2. "I have come to the conclusion that it is unlikely that you believe X." Unfortunately, in this forum, we are forced to communicate without the benefit of vocal inflection. Sometimes, this contributes to misunderstandings. I have the impression that you interpreted a certain statement in the first manner, above, and have not considered applying the second interpretation. If that is not the case, please disregard my attempted clarification (with my apologies.) Incidentally, I am addressing this issue for the second and last time, in the hope that we can finally retire it. It has grown tiresome. (Please do not misinterpret my comment as an attempt to censor you. You are entirely within your rights to continue beating this dead horse, as is everyone else. I will simply click past any further post on this issue, as is my right.) Good luck to you, RB

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (11503)	11/19/1997 5:36:00 PM
From: squetch	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 32384

Henry's Background: Henry post (11.17.97) sums up his background among other things. link to 153 lists his background. techstocks.com Zuespaul referenced (11.16.97) the bap post I mentioned which includes answers to questions some have not asked yet(:>) techstocks.com A Dec '96 Henry post on his background. techstocks.com Also in the spring/early summer Henry did a story on SI re LGND. I am not sure but the preface discussed his background. I know the link was posted on SI Home area and the thread. Since Henry wrote it perhaps he can dig it up faster and post the link to you. I am sure that there are smaller pieces of his background such as this techstocks.com posted throughout the thread. I would also suggest if you are interested in his background to go here patent.womplex.ibm.com Search under his name 71-present. I hope this helps. squetch PS Please call me Stan or squetch or even Chicken Little, just not Sir.(:>)