Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (158758)	10/21/2011 9:41:34 AM
From: elmatador	2 Recommendations Respond to of 206097

Angola returns to the oil markets While Libya has monopolised the attention of the oil market this year, Angola has also been a source of supply disruptions, helping to push crude oil prices higher. The west African country, which joined the Opec oil cartel in 2007, has seen its output fall significantly in 2011. In 2010 it pumped an average of 1.85m barrels a day, but so far this year it has managed just 1.65m b/d. Yet oil production is now starting to recover after lengthy repairs and the start up of new oil fields, weighing on prices. Angola is far more important to the oil market than appears at first glance. The country produces a mere two per cent of global output but the headline figure is deceptive. Angola pumps a particularly low-sulphur crude, sought after by Chinese and Indian refineries to produce high-quality gasoline and diesel. Beijing bought about 45 per cent of Angola’s output last year. The US and India are the second and third largest buyers, accounting for another third of its exports. Over the last decade Angola has been one of the success stories of the oil industry, more than doubling its production. Output rose from about 750,000 b/d in 2001 to a peak of nearly 2m b/d in January 2010, according to the US Department of Energy. Since early last year, production growth has stalled – and production may have even fallen – because of a hiatus of new projects and glitches in several fields. The shortfall has pushed China and other developing countries to buy more crude from Nigeria, which usually goes to Europe, contributing to higher Brent oil prices. But the period of falling output appears to be coming to an end. Output surged in September to a 16-month peak and all points to further increases next year. If the trend is confirmed, Angola could become a downward force for oil prices. One factor contributing to the alleviation of Angola’s production issues is that the technical problems in the ExxonMobil-operated Saxi-Batuque fields and the BP-operated Greater Plutonio development are slowly being resolved. Although the critical water injection system of the Greater Plutonio field continues to give headaches to BP, output in both fields should rise by 150,000 b/d. Another is that after nearly a two-year hiatus, international oil companies are bringing new oil fields on stream. The Pazflor field will add 200,000 b/d by the end of the year. Operated by Total of France, the field started pumping ahead of schedule on August 24. Moreover, BP is expected to add another 150,000 from March-April when it opens the taps of its Plutao, Saturna, Venus and Marte cluster of oil fields. ExxonMobil could add another 150,000 b/d of capacity with the start of satellite fields from its Kizomba-D cluster. In total, Angolan production capacity should recover by 400,000 b/d year-on-year, taking into account new additions and the expected natural decline of older fields. The output limitations imposed by Opec could cut the actual swing in 2012 but production should increase enough to help to lower oil prices next year. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2011. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (158758)	10/21/2011 9:53:07 AM
From: dvdw©	Respond to of 206097

The Hyperion Project in Elk Point SD remains the wild card, if the Hyperion is built the dynamics for XL and everything else in the northern basin, including Canada change...and change for the better. No one is talking about this, yet its the first viable refinery proposal that has been permitted in the last 20 years...biggest obstacle, political self interests of many bought and paid fors.

To: Ed Ajootian who wrote (158758)	10/21/2011 11:32:20 PM
From: raybiese	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206097

Ed: I would like to reinforce your statement that the pipelines are significant. Not only are they significant, but the control of the pipelines is critical to the control of US crude prices. Follow the money. Both the Seaway and Capline pipelines were built to offload offshore crude and transport it to Cushing and Mid-Continent refiners (south of Chicago). Both are still flowing north at greatly reduced capacity. If both were reversed, this would add up to ~350 + ~1,200= ~1.5 million bbl/day flowing southward to the US Gulf Coast. The increases in production from Canada displaced northerly Capline flows (over several years) some time ago. About a year ago, a new Keystone pipe flowing south into Cushing (plus increased Bakken production) displaced even more Seaway northerly flows. But that is just the 'bulk flow' story. Grade counts. Most of the crude flowing from Canada is heavy-sour grade including WCS (API ~32), other heavy grades and blended bitumen, but much of new production is heavy-sour or dilbit (API 17-22). Many of the Mid-Continent refiners have made the investment to be able to process heavy grades over the past several years [e.g. Koch and COP refineries. A 300 kbpd expansion of heavy crude processing capability is nearing or has been completed at COP/CVE Woods River (2008 to 2011). en.wikipedia.org Koch has invested in heavy crude processing capability. fhr.com ] Many of the US Gulf Coast refiners are already processing Mexican Mayan (API 22) or Venezuelan Heavy (API 17-24) so the switch to Canadian heavy grades delivered via the Keystone XL will not require a big investment (saving time and money). In effect, XL enables the partial displacement/replacement of Mayan & Venezuelan heavy. The price differential is quite large now but, IMHO, would expect the current $20~$30/bbl differential to be reduced once XL flows. (many data sources e.g. eia.gov ) I would guess that the US Gulf Coast refiners are salivating over the prospect of getting cheaper heavy Canadian crude but the simple fact of Mexican decline rates makes XL a priority for them. "Of this, the Mayan, or heavy oil component, has seen the largest reduction, accounting for 75% of the decline in crude exports since 2004." "exports of heavy oil to the U.S. will be continuing to decline in the range of 150 to 200 thousand B/d by the end of 2010" (http://www.firstenergy.com/research/documents/Facts-I-SpotlightMexico-2009-03-27.pdf ) IMHO, if the Hardisty-Maya/Venezuela differential does not shrink significantly, and quickly, expect all long-term future growth in Canadian heavy crude production to be shipped overseas. Delays on XL will just accelerate the decision making. So your comment "will not re-emerge for many moons if at all." is partially true. In the short-term to medium term.... true. In the medium to long-term? IMHO, nope. Few off-shore refiners are set-up for heavy crude, however, I am guessing the Chinese are converting/have already converted some capacity to heavy feedstocks because of investments in Venezuela several years ago. Any commitment of an off-shore refiner to spend an extra couple of hundred million dollars to process heavy crudes will require a corresponding commitment for secure supply for many years. As the Chinese already own many tens of billions of barrels (hundreds of billions?) of Canadian reserves and production, the only thing left is the transport mechanism. [Aside: Do not expect a significant drop in US gasoline or diesel prices because of the completion of the XL pipeline. US Gulf Coast refiners will sell the product to whomever pays the most... where ever the customers are.... around the globe, the US East Coast or Europe.... at world prices minus transport cost.] The simple fact is that the US transport fuel market is declining, not growing. Having growing crude production from Canada, Bakken and NGL's 'stranded' in the US Mid-West will not be tolerated for very long. I would guess that there is great concern in Ottawa and Edmonton that this issue might hit the Canadian public interest 'hot list'. If it does and the public perceives that actions were taken, or not taken, that were not in the best interests of Canada, then incumbent governments will most certainly fall. To put a scale to this issue, the dollars involved in the Hardisty-Maya/Venezuela differential exceeds the balance of trade deficit for the entire country or would be almost equal to the projected 2012 deficit for the Canadian Federal government. This is not 'small potatoes' or 'irritant' scale to the Canadians. It is "That's not fair so screw you" scale. Ray