SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Data Race (NASDAQ: RACE) NEWS! 2 voice/data/fax: ONE LINE! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ignacio Mosqueira who wrote (25816)11/20/1997 7:33:00 AM
From: WW.com  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33268
 
Ignacio...your comments on Drakes 240+90+23 are right on the money. Thank-you for stating them.



To: Ignacio Mosqueira who wrote (25816)11/20/1997 8:56:00 AM
From: Brian Fuller  Respond to of 33268
 
>>Do not kid yourself, your making money so far has nothing to do with you being right.<<

Ah now I know what my problem has been this year, I've been right way too much.



To: Ignacio Mosqueira who wrote (25816)11/20/1997 9:44:00 AM
From: drakes353  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33268
 
Ignacio:

In fact I expect a step function kicking strongly as soon as inacom
begins to sell and the doubling again after that.


So are you saying you expect the sales to be higher when the product begins to sell? (pause for comedic effect) Gotcha. Kind of a Yogi-ism that, eh? One of my favorite Yogi-isms is "We just can't get these guys out by walking them." That Yogi.

Needless to say my estimate while uncertain will be much better than your off to lunch nonsense.

Put up a number and then we'll talk. Nothing to fear. If you're wrong, you're wrong. I've still got you down for $43 million in sales over the next 11.5 months. Have you changed that number? (BTW, it's out to lunch.)

When I said double or better I had a reason. NOte that it is the lowest estimate (ie at least that).

It's all meaningless bluster until you put up a number.

drakes353