Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (20307)	11/20/1997 2:04:00 AM
From: RBM	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Mike, I do want you to know, I am not upset with your content, or what you say or how you say it, its just were on opposite sides of the fence, you gotta protect it sometime. I wish I could just believe that DM is my hero, but I doubt it. Shorting stock is a part of his business. If he were a real man, he would just step up, pay the lousy 75.00 and given it to us straight. I did talk to jeju hand, and quite frankly my friend, he was more interested in how much I owned, as opposed to why I bought it. I guess the biggest thing is, you either believe that big money runs the pennie or you don't. Big money can either short you to death, or bring you to respectibility. Big money also lines the pockets of the SEC and the NASD ups. I don't doubt that for a minute, the Gov't is so dirty anyhow. I too have friends who work for different branches of our intelligence, (FBI, CIA) and they have told me some interesting stuff about the Gov't. All I can say is I believe one way or another this company was shorted through the toliet. It start last year about Sept. There was a press release about it, (not about shorting, but about the sudden drop in price) I think that is what spurred the 2 million share buyback. Somebody knew this company was going to have a hard time, and they decided to put some of that Big money into it. They probably made a fortune on it, meanwhile the company suffers damage that is pretty much devestating. I'm rambling, sorry. Rob

To: michael d kugler who wrote (20307)	11/20/1997 2:07:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Kugler, you're HUBRIS is self-evident and so is the squeeze, no matter how you sugar-coat it, MORK is still short, those 144's were pre-split, they were put into play last MARCH-APRIL, and went mainly to pay off loans, if Morgan or Roland cashed in on any of the inside shares they'd have to have filed w/ the SEC...YOU KNOW THIS!! YOU ALSO KNOW MORK IS SHORT, Morks letter tonight is evidence of that...you're scaring people toi shake shares on the internet, AND THATS ILLEGAL to, its' fraud!, Pugs