Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (53130)	12/9/2011 3:46:12 PM
From: ggersh	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 119361

O and all future Prez's still have to much power killing Americans w/out a trial isn't right.

To: bentway who wrote (53130)	12/9/2011 6:36:36 PM
From: Broken_Clock	8 Recommendations Respond to of 119361

"Both bills would reaffirm the government’s ability to detain suspects more or less indefinitely. " So you agree with having no Constitutional rights as a citizen of the US going forward?

To: bentway who wrote (53130)	12/10/2011 8:52:29 PM
From: No Mo Mo	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 119361

"Obama has already said he'd veto this bill for just this reason." First of all, Carl Levin begs to disagree: youtube.com And secondly, a veto might be nothing more than political cover for a bill like this. From the comments: "1031 is not a law. it is a section in a larger piece of legislation called The National Defense Authorization Act. It has been enacted for each of the past 48 years to specify the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense. by vetoing this bill obama would appear that he didn't care about the military, which is generally considered political suicide. THAT is why he won't veto this bill. even if he did, there is enough support in congress to overturn? any veto. "