Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (463443)	1/4/2012 8:52:56 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793999

I don't think we have the luxury of picking bad over very bad any more. We need to stop the train now or our fate is out of our hands.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (463443)	1/4/2012 9:10:12 PM
From: goldworldnet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793999

>>bush certainly put hints out there about his 'compassionate conservatism'<< Only time will tell, but I think Romney would be better. * * *

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (463443)	1/4/2012 9:25:09 PM
From: skinowski	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793999

>>> his 'compassionate conservatism' read: gov't spending was in his mind....<<<<< Politicians forget that numbers matter. I'm impressed with the fact that our good Uncle borrows and spends about $125 billion more each month than what he collects in taxes. How much is this per each gainfully employed productive person? A thousand or so? Probably more. And this is not all they spend, it's just the part that comes from new borrowing. And they pretend that this is normal. They are insane, and the economists who give them theoretical "cover" are also insane.