Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (268900)	1/5/2012 2:12:16 PM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Again, you are mischaracterizing the situation. In your biased and prejudging mind you see the evidence as "overwhelming", yet the evidence is only overwhelming *when you just hear one side.* As you can only comprehend that "Parts is Parts", the weight that you assign to *the perfectly legal rebates* is disproportional. A) There is only one side talking. B) You have no basis to make definitive claims regarding the legality of the rebates. Your naive and pedestrian understanding of the semiconductor business has done far more damage to your credibility than I could ever do. You were spoon fed, by multiple professionals, a commentary on AMD's false and misleading claims. You failed to comprehend then and you fail to give credit now to the knowledge and wisdom presented to you free of charge. You still fail to comprehend that the SEC's allegations were just that, allegations, they are unproven and no Court of Law has ever agreed with your view. Blah blah blah... No Court of Law has ever agreed with you either, nor any other administrative body. Your knowlege and wisdom amount to squat re: Intel in court. >The public evidence indicates that Intel paid DELL to exclude AMD. It does to you, when only one side of the story is heard by a ill informed, prejudiced novice who still believes that "Parts is Parts". I have no reason to distrust the SEC and their interpretation of the evidence they had access to. You clearly do... But I doubt it's based on evidence. Funny how Intel never gets to tell their side... fpg