Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : QDRX -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. Davies who wrote (3130)	11/21/1997 12:53:00 PM
From: J. Davies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3977

U.S. District Court District of Rhode Island (Providence) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-20 Power Stick, et al v. Quadrax Filed: 01/16/97 Assigned to: Judge Ernest C. Torres Jury demand: Plaintiff Demand: $0,000 Nature of Suit: 830 Lead Docket: None Jurisdiction: Federal Question 6/26/97 -- Jury trial held. DAY 5. Marusak/Angelone. Jury deliberates and returns verdict for Plaintiff. Nominal damages - $1.00; Punitive damages - $150,000. Judgment to enter w/injunctive relief. Deft's motion for stay DENIED. (mib) 6/26/97 37 JURY VERDICT for Power Stick, Advanced Pultrusion (mib) 6/26/97 38 Minute entry re: jury trial (mib) [Entry date 06/27/97] 6/27/97 39 JUDGMENT for Power Stick, Advanced Pultrusion against Quadrax as to Counts 1 and 6. (mib) 6/27/97 39 JUDGMENT for Quadrax against Power Stick, Advanced Pultrusion as to Counts 7 and 8. (mib) For those non-lawyers out there - the jury found Quadrax guilty of conversion of Power Stick's property (i.e. theft) and awarded punitive damages to Power Stick. Punitive damages are only awarded if the jury finds that the defendant's behavior has been wilful, wanton and malicious to the point of criminality Who is responsible for Quadrax's wilful, wanton and malicious behavior that a jury decided was almost criminal?? JD

To: J. Davies who wrote (3130)	11/22/1997 3:48:00 PM
From: strtrset	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3977

To JDavies: Since you have started posting on this thread I and my friends have not read one instance where you were positive on this company. You have had a free run at criticizing Jim Palermo and current management. The management at Quadrax does not have the same license that you or the rest of the people on this thread because it is against policy for management to engage in a rebutal. We asked Jim Palermo if there were some way to make this an even playing field. He said he would gladly give you 4 hours of his time to show you the plant and to go over any constuctive ideas you have about this company's future and direction. The ball is in your court. We on this thread would like to hear about the outcome of this meeting. Jim said to call and set up an appropiate time for you and he to meet.