Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (268954)	1/9/2012 2:11:46 PM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Not surprisingly you can't call it that but from the document: I'm surprised you're "not surprised" that we're agreed on MM being full of it... "The calculation of the percentage rebate evolved over time [HELLO GLARING LOOPHOLE] and was ultimately based on a percentage of Dell's entire net spend with Intel." lol, Immediately followed by: "This MOAPapproach, which Intel couid have ceased or amended at any time, relieved Dell of the need to justify each rebate that it sought." (I encourage everyone to check Elmer's train of thought by reading the SEC's complaint.) Elmer, do you really want to get into a quote war with me over the SEC's material? Let us also remind you that these are allegations. I know in your mind an allegation is a fact if it's against Intel but fortunately the Justice system does not carry your bias. Actually, these are not allegations. They're descriptions of evidence that the allegations (i.e. CLAIMS) are based upon. You know, stuff that they could substantiate in court if need be. The 10 Claims are listed starting on page 46. fpg