SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bentway who wrote (642089)1/13/2012 2:43:12 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578689
 
Isn't it true your only travel has been to find cheaper dope or whores?



To: bentway who wrote (642089)1/13/2012 3:29:57 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1578689
 
Has the war criminal Obama resigned over pissgate yet ? I see an up coming trial at the Hague for that boy



To: bentway who wrote (642089)1/13/2012 7:41:39 PM
From: PROLIFE1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1578689
 
wow...you really impress me with your exploits......ahahahaha....but, of course you are a liar. If you wish I will call that to your face...how about it, sissy?



To: bentway who wrote (642089)1/13/2012 7:51:03 PM
From: PROLIFE2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1578689
 
Twelve More Solyndras

Crony capitalism and coercive ideology march blindly onward.

by John Hayward

01/13/2012



You loved that half-billion-dollar Solyndra disaster, didn’t you? Sure, who didn’t? Over $500 million of taxpayer loot recklessly stuffed into the pockets of top Obama contributor George Kaiser, to bankroll a failed company that currently rots in bankruptcy… but is still trying to ladle out huge bonuses to its six-figure employees.

Well, great news! CBS News found a dozen more Solyndras – “green energy” companies pumped full of your money in defiance of all business sense:

Take Beacon Power -- a green energy storage company. We were surprised to learn exactly what the Energy Department? knew before committing $43 million of your tax dollars.

Documents obtained by CBS News show Standard and Poor's had confidentially given the project a dismal outlook of "CCC-plus."

Asked whether he'd put his personal money into Beacon, economist Peter Morici replied, "Not on purpose."

"It's, it is a junk bond," Morici said. "But it's not even a good junk bond. It's well below investment grade."

Was the Energy Department investing tax dollars in something that's not even a good junk bond? Morici says yes.

"This level of bond has about a 70 percent chance of failing in the long term," he said.

You read that right, folks: Beacon Power had a CCC-plus toxic rating from S&P before investment genius Barack Obama poured $43 million of your money into it. They did indeed go bankrupt, two months ago. No, you probably aren’t getting your money back.

But wait, there’s more!

CBS News counted 12 clean energy companies that are having trouble after collectively being approved for more than $6.5 billion in federal assistance. Five have filed for bankruptcy: The junk bond-rated Beacon, Evergreen Solar, SpectraWatt, AES' subsidiary Eastern Energy and Solyndra.

Others are also struggling with potential problems. Nevada Geothermal -- a home state project personally endorsed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid -- warns of multiple potential defaults in new SEC filings reviewed by CBS News. It was already having trouble paying the bills when it received $98.5 million in Energy Department loan guarantees.

Well, at least all this is stimulating American business, right?

SunPower landed a deal linked to a $1.2 billion loan guarantee last fall, after a French oil company took it over. On its last financial statement, SunPower owed more than it was worth. On its last financial statement, SunPower owed more than it was worth. SunPower's role is to design, build and initially operate and maintain the California Valley Solar Ranch Project that's the subject of the loan guarantee.

(Emphasis mine.) Oh. Well, at least the French will be grateful that Barack Obama forced American taxpayers to subsidize one of their American corporate acquisitions.

These disasters couldn’t have been corrupt examples of politicians raiding the federal refrigerator for bacon they could drag back to their home states, could they? Naaaaaah….

Others are also struggling with potential problems. Nevada Geothermal -- a home state project personally endorsed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid -- warns of multiple potential defaults in new SEC filings reviewed by CBS News. It was already having trouble paying the bills when it received $98.5 million in Energy Department loan guarantees.

Oh, but that’s not all. On top of those loan guarantees, Nevada Geothermal also received “at least $66 million in grants,” as the New York Times reported back in October. At the time, company executives were “expressing confidence that they can recover,” and assuring everyone in earshot that “the government investment is not at risk.” The poisonous reasoning behind these “green energy” debacles was made abundantly clear by a Reid spokesman:

Mr. Reid has received some support from the industry, in the form of at least $43,000 worth of campaign contributions from the geothermal industry since 2009, according to an analysis of federal campaign finance records.

Adam Jentleson, a spokesman for Mr. Reid, said that the senator was proud of his work as an advocate for geothermal power and a broad array of other clean energy projects in his state. But Mr. Jentleson, and the Energy Department spokesman, said Nevada Geothermal company had not received, nor been offered, any special treatment.

If projects like this did not contain a certain level of risk, alongside their enormous potential for creating jobs and generating clean energy, there would be no need for the bipartisan loan guarantee program,” Mr. Jentleson said.

Precisely. These projects don’t make any economic sense, so they can’t attract enough willing investors. Therefore, high-powered politicians and lobbyists force the rest of us to “invest” in them, so we can Win The Future. Meanwhile, these phony politically-invented “opportunities” attract investors who like the idea of government using compulsive force to make taxpayers cover any losses that might be incurred. Capital is thus diverted away from truly viable and useful opportunities. If you’re still wondering how deranged levels of government spending actually kill jobs, instead of merely failing to create enough of them, this is part of the answer: polluting the market with false data.

As the Times pointed out, plenty of Republicans and the Bush Administration supported this type of thinking too, which is why it’s important to dismantle the whole diseased system, rather than simply installing new management. Or we could just re-elect Barack Obama, keep Harry Reid in charge of the system, and get ready for the next dozen Solyndras.







John Hayward is a staff writer for HUMAN EVENTS,



To: bentway who wrote (642089)1/13/2012 8:58:09 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578689
 
bentway travels all over, sharing drugs with prostitutes and enjoying his LSD.



To: bentway who wrote (642089)1/14/2012 9:28:08 AM
From: Brumar895 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578689
 
Americans don't share liberal outrage over urinategate

Russ Vaughn

The liberal media and administration officials are seething with shocked outrage at the release of a video depicting the desecration by urination of three Taliban corpses by four U.S. Marines. Interestingly, the American public is neither as incensed nor apparently even shocked by the revelation. The Washington Post in its online account has included a reader poll with these three options:

What was your reaction to the video that appeared to show Marines urinating on three Afghan corpses?

It's an unacceptable desecration - 12%

It's an embarrassment - 7%

It's not surprising -- things like this happen in war - 81%

Total Votes: 13,445

No doubt the enraged elites will be equally outraged at such poll results, evidence of the validity of their snide condescension toward the majority of Americans who to them are nothing more than vulgar barbarians clinging to their God and their guns. What that poll says to me is that the American people understand that while urinating on your dead enemy may show a serious lack of respect, it in no way rises to the level of seriousness of that of actually killing them.

But then again, the liberals are the same folks who don't give second thought to launching a Hellfire missile from a drone and wiping out a squad of Taliban or Al Qaeda but woe be unto the American trooper who dares inflict pain on a survivor to obtain critical intelligence. They're the same fools who deplore American forces for not fighting fair. Of that concept, warrior/author, Col. David Hackworth, R.I.P., famously said, "If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan your mission properly."

Democratic Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, was quick to describe the actions of the Marines as, "Utterly deplorable." What I find utterly deplorable is another news story today that is being ignored by the liberal media although it is spreading in the conservative blogosphere. It concerns an excerpt from a new book about our Mideast wars by Michael Hastings, The Operators, wherein a state department official describes the less-than-commander-in-chief-like behavior of Barack Obama on a visit to Baghdad:

After the talk, out of earshot from the soldiers and diplomats, he starts to complain. He starts to act very un-Obamalike, according to a U.S. embassy official who helped organize the trip in Baghdad. He's asked to go out to take a few more pictures with soldiers and embassy staffers. He's asked to sign copies of his book. "He didn't want to take pictures with any more soldiers; he was complaining about it," a State Department official tells me. "Look, I was excited to meet him. I wanted to like him. Let's just say the scales fell from my eyes after I did. These are people over here who've been fighting the war, or working every day for the war effort, and he didn't want to take f**king pictures with them?"

As an old combat infantryman who served, incidentally, in the same Airborne infantry regiment at the same time as Col. Hackworth in Vietnam, I've witnessed post-mortem desecration, usually not by our troops, but not infrequently by our Asian enemies, not to mention our Asian allies. Such practices are not uncommon in many regions of the world and generally only become news when it's our troops who get caught doing it. My reaction to this incident tends to reflect the views of that huge 80% majority polling at WAPO that things like this happen in war.

So for our Marines, that's a big Semper Fi!

To the Marines involved in this incident, some advice from Ol' Sarge: You may be under heavy fire for now, but that poll, in one of the nation's most prominent major liberal newspapers, should tell you that the American people are willing to forgive and forget. We can only hope that Leon and his generals will take note of the numbers. What all our warriors have to remember is that with these liberal airheads who unfortunately control most of the news, it's OK to keep hunting down these jihadists and killing them as long as you do so in a tastefully sensitive manner. You know, like a metrosexual Marine Corps.

So hey, you tough-guy Marines, next time, to keep from whipping up a froth among the weenies at WAPO, just keep 'em zipped.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/01/americans_dont_share_liberal_outrage_over_urinategate.html#ixzz1jRVfzaYF