SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (64363)1/17/2012 10:32:05 AM
From: John5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Back to the topic at hand, the fact of the matter is that Whites do not enjoy the same freedoms and liberties under the Constitution that Blacks enjoy.

As I pass through the checkout lane at the grocery, I see Ebony magazine, Essence magazine, and Jet magazine. I have no problem with these, per se. However, if there were an Ivory magazine or Snow White magazine occupying the space next to the Black magazines, there would be a national outcry of racism until the grocer conceded and stop carrying the "White racist filth." It wouldn't end there either. Civil lawsuits would be forthcoming against the grocer. The chain could also face discrimination lawsuits from the government.

Likewise, I see a Congressional Black Caucus, Miss Black America, a United Negro College Fund, Black Entertainment Television, and affirmative action laws all dedicated to the special interests of Blacks.

Would a Congressional White Caucus, Miss White America, United Caucasian College Fund, White Entertainment Television, or magazines dedicated to White interests be socially acceptable?

My direct question to you is this, jlallen: "Why is it that only Whites are discriminated against and punished for perceived racism?"