SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (465713)1/18/2012 2:44:44 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 794373
 
The games seem to have been called off, by one side or the other. Where the hell is our media on this? Even the conservative blogs have been silent.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (465713)1/18/2012 2:49:06 AM
From: LindyBill2 Recommendations  Respond to of 794373
 
Front page has it:

"Wrong Move

Posted By Alan W. Dowd On January 18, 2012 @ 12:19 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | No Comments

Worried about aggravating Iran, the United States has announced that it is postponing missile-defense drills with Israel. Dubbed "Austere Challenge 12," the exercises had been planned for months and were intended to send a clear message that the United States and Israel were prepared to protect themselves from Iran's mushrooming missile threat. In fact, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta last month pointed to the exercises as evidence of America's "unshakable" commitment to Israel. Now that the exercises have been delayed, the mullahs are getting a very different message.

A U.S. European Command official assures us that "It is not unusual for such exercises to be postponed," which is true. But timing is everything when dealing with aggressors. Washington's intentions are good—to avert an accidental war—but the perception in Tehran is that Washington blinked. That means the mullahs won this round. And as with all aggressors, that emboldens them and encourages them to push harder, to take more risks and to make dangerous miscalculations that invite the very thing Washington is trying to avoid.

One recalls how the Carter administration reacted to Moammar Qaddafi's unilateral claim over the Gulf of Sidra, a huge chunk of the Mediterranean Sea universally considered as international waters. Anyone who crossed Qaddafi's so-called "line of death" in the Gulf of Sidra would face military attack. President Carter canceled annual freedom-of-navigation naval exercises in and around the Gulf of Sidra to avoid confrontation and to keep things calm in the region.

But the message Qaddafi heard was that America was weak, and so he pushed and miscalculated. U.S. intelligence soon unearthed evidence that Libyan agents were planning to hit Marine One with a heat-seeking missile; Libya was caught red-handed sending tons of military hardware to communist forces in Nicaragua; and Qaddafi's army of terrorists was at work all around the globe.

Vowing to enforce the principle of freedom of the seas, President Reagan ordered the U.S. Sixth Fleet to resume its exercises. When the exercises began in the autumn of 1981, Qaddafi lived up to his word and sent several warplanes into international airspace to enforce his line of death. Authorized, in Reagan's words, to pursue attacking Libyan warplanes "all the way into the hangar," U.S. F-14s responded with deadly force and made it clear to Qaddafi that there would be no payoff for recklessly disregarding international norms—only costs. "We sent a message to Qaddafi," Reagan said. "We weren't going to allow him to declare squatter's rights over a huge area of the Mediterranean in defiance of international law."

The moral of the story is that in international relations, every action and non-action sends a message. The postponement of Austere Challenge 12 sends the wrong message. Just when the pressure was building on the mullahs—on the economic front, in the Strait of Hormuz, vis-à-vis European energy imports, at the IAEA—Washington put Austere Challenge 12 on hold and relieved the pressure.

It's important to note that these U.S.-Israel exercises were wholly defensive. As The Washington Post reports, they were "designed to test multiple Israeli and U.S. air defense systems against incoming missiles and rockets."

Think about that. These weren't provocative naval maneuvers off Iran's coast or massive air exercises feigning attacks across the skies of the Middle East. These were missile-defense exercises designed to test U.S.-Israeli forces in deflecting inbound missile threats.

Defense is the operative word here. To cut through all the relativistic confusion, consider this everyday example: Which one of the following would you call provocative—a cop strapping on a bullet-proof vest or a gunman loading his weapon?

Because the gunman is loading his weapon and taking dead aim at Israel and the U.S., the two allies have dramatically deepened and expanded their cooperation on missile defense in recent years.

After being pelted by 39 Scud missiles in 1991—and being targeted by a regime in Iran that vows to wipe it off the map—Israel has an appreciation for missile defense that others lack. That appreciation is enhanced by the fact that Israel has seen missile defenses work in battle. The Patriot system, though imperfect and rudimentary during the 1991 Gulf War, and the Iron Dome system have scored successes and saved Israeli lives. Moreover, Israel's Arrow anti-missile system is perhaps the best on earth. With most of the tests conducted in the United States and half the funding coming from the U.S., the Arrow wouldn't exist without American support.

As if to return the favor, in 2008, Israel allowed the U.S. to install missile-defense radars in Israel to support a growing international network of missile defenses—an international missile defense (IMD) coalition, for lack of a better term. Led by the U.S., dozens of countries are signing on to the IMD team because the missile threat has rapidly metastasized. Three decades ago, there were nine countries that possessed ballistic missiles. Today, there are 32. As a 2010 Pentagon report warned, "The ballistic missile threat is increasing both quantitatively and qualitatively."

Several of the countries in the growing ballistic-missile club are unfriendly or unstable. Iran, North Korea and Syria fall into the former category, Pakistan and Egypt into the latter. Four of those countries are in Israel's neighborhood. Two are right next door.

Of course, North Korea and Iran are the most worrisome to the U.S. North Korea stunned the world with long-range missile tests in the 1990s and nuclear tests in the 2000s. In fact, since 2009, North Korea has detonated a nuclear weapon, has test-fired long-range missiles and has begun deploying a road-mobile ICBM, which will allow the Kim Dynasty to hide its missile arsenal.

Reading from the same script, Iran has carried out "covert ballistic missile tests and rocket launches, including testing missiles capable of delivering a nuclear payload," according to the British government. Iran recently took delivery of 19 intermediate-range missiles from North Korea. The missiles give Iran the ability to strike as far away as Berlin. The Defense Intelligence Agency estimates Iran could have a surface-to-surface missile capable of hitting the United States by 2015. But Iran's missile reach is not limited to land-based rockets. In 2004, high-level Pentagon officials confirmed that Iran secretly test-fired a ballistic missile from a cargo ship. Hiding a Scud-type missile and launcher below decks, the ship set out to sea and then transformed into a floating launch pad, peeling back the deck and firing the missile, before reconfiguring itself into a nondescript cargo ship.

In short, Israel probably isn't the only country within Iran's reach."

frontpagemag.com




To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (465713)1/18/2012 2:51:40 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794373
 
Here's Haaretz:

"Obama promises to consult Jordan on Israeli-Palestinian peace talk issues
Israeli Ambassador to U.S.: Decision to postpone Austere Challenge 12 military drill was taken jointly by EUCOM and IDF.
By Avi Issacharoff and Natasha Mozgovaya

The United States will consult closely with Jordan to encourage Israel and the Palestinians to negotiate in a "serious fashion" to find peace, U.S. President Barack Obama said Tuesday.

Speaking in the Oval Office alongside Jordan's King Abdullah II, Obama said he appreciated Jordan's leadership on the stalled peace effort.

After the meeting Abdullah told reporters the talks were in their early stages and that "we have to keep our fingers crossed." Abdullah told the Washington Post in an interview that, because of the elections in the United States, "we can't expect for the Americans to wade in, full-weight, unless we have enough of a package where the outcome is somewhat predictable."

Abdullah also said that "the presidential card can only be played once, and we are nowhere near the position at this stage where the presidential card can be played. It is up to us to do the heavy lifting, not the president."

With regard to progress on the first three meetings that have been held since early January in Amman, Abdullah reported there had been "baby steps."

"Waiting is the worst mistake the Israelis can make. It wasn't until the elections in Egypt that suddenly Israel awoke ... Now I think there has been a big shift in the way the Israelis look at the issue, and it is imperative for them [to] get the Israeli-Palestinian issue off the menu."

Abdullah said that sooner or later a line would be crossed where the two-state solution is no longer possible - if it has not been crossed already, "at which point the only solution is the one-state solution. And then, are we talking about apartheid or democracy? The more the Israelis play with kicking this down the line, the more they are in danger of losing what they think is the ideal future Israel," the king said.

The next meeting between the parties is scheduled for January 25. Although the Quartet has set January 26 as the deadline for the presentation of concrete proposals on issues like borders and security, sources in the U.S. State Department said that focusing on the deadline will only sabotage the atmosphere of the talks and that what is important is that the parties are talking directly to each other.

Abdullah said in the short term the Jordanians were trying to get the Palestinians and Israelis to talk about security and borders, and added, "I think once you've defined the issue of borders, then you've solved the issue of settlements, and you can go straight into security talks."

Abdullah is scheduled to meet Wednesday with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Meanwhile, two issues are causing some tension in relations between Israel and the United States. Officials in Israel said they were unhappy with American leaks ahead of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman's expected visit in early February that some senior U.S. administration officials did not want to be photographed with Lieberman. "That is not an insult to Lieberman, it is an insult to Israel," an Israeli official said. Washington did not respond officially to reports from Israel but noted that arrangements such as joint photos were made shortly before meetings and that the visit was still under preparation.

The second issue was with regard to who specifically had canceled the joint U.S.-Israeli military exercise that was to have been the biggest in the history of ties between the two countries. The Israelis say the Americans canceled it, while according to The Atlantic Magazine, sources in the U.S. administration said Defense Minister Ehud Barak had called Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and asked to cancel the exercise, which worried the Americans as it could appear to the Iranians to signal preparations for an attack on Iran.

The Israeli Embassy responded that a joint decision was made to postpone the exercise to the latter part of this year. "The decision, taken jointly by the European Command (EUCOM) and by the IDF, stemmed solely from technical issues," Israeli Ambassador to the United States Michael Oren said in a statement Monday, adding, "Such postponements are routine and do not reflect political or strategic concerns."

"The United States and Israel remain committed to holding the exercise - code-named Austere Challenge 12 - the largest and most robust in their historic alliance," he said."

haaretz.com




To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (465713)1/18/2012 11:12:27 AM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794373
 
If one were about to attack this would be a classic feint, and about the only one available. They must pretend there is internal discord.

It's pretty hard to hide 10,000 US troops in Israel and our carrier strike groups kind of stick out like a sore thumb.

Just sayin...how else could you pretend you are not about to attack?

For an armchair QB this is a pretty good sign the attack might happen.

mj@Suntzu.com

Joint US-Israel drill called off by Netanyahu, to Washington's surprise