Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (465742)	1/18/2012 8:01:30 AM
From: lorne	2 Recommendations Respond to of 793955

How will all world tyrants view the USA after the hussein obama disaster? Iran promises to return US drone - as a pink toy It may not have been quite what Barack Obama meant when he called on Iran to return a US drone that crashed in the Islamic Republic. Wednesday 18 January 2012 By Raf Sanchez, Washington telegraph.co.uk Rather than giving back the multi-million dollar piece of spyware, which has been gleefully paraded for the world's cameras, an Iranian toy maker has promised to send the White House a pink plastic toy replica of the downed drone. The Ayeh Art group has been doing a brisk trade in models of the RQ-170, producing around 2,000 a day, and in an inspired moment of self-publicity has promised to reserve one for President Obama. “He said he wanted it back, and we will send him one,” said Reza Kioumars, the company's head of cultural production. As well as coming in a garish range of colours unlikely to considered by the US military, the model drones have one other addition, courtesy of the regime. Each toy aircraft carries the slogan "We will America under our feet," a favourite saying of Ayatollah Khomeini. Progress on return of the real drone is going less well: Iran last demanded an apology from the US before it would even considering handing back the craft. There was no immediate reaction from the White House.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (465742)	1/18/2012 12:47:48 PM
From: MJ	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793955

This is the message that you posted to which I was responding. Perhaps I misread the message. I took the last paragraph, the second to be your opinion. Or, is it Ed Rollins' opinion. If not, then I stand by precisely what I wrote. "Did it ever occur to you that all of these candidates were all running because they love America and want to defeat Obama" I also believe that Romney and Paul are running from that position albeit with extremely different viewpoints on various questions. mj In Reference to the folowing: To: Bill who wrote (465661) 1/17/2012 8:46:55 PM From: MulhollandDrive 2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 465780 yep.... i just watched ed rollins say that romney and paul were the only 'real' candidates....the rest is just noise... i've believed from day one, that gingrich and santorum and cain were in it for the money, perry was a johnny come lately just doing it because 'he thought he could' and bachmann probably a combination of money and 'because she could'