SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mel221 who wrote (107899)1/22/2012 8:10:56 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
The Tea Party had no viable plan. They are just mad and don't even know at what. Every time Tea party people were asked their plan, they had none.

You do point out the big problem in the country, accusing people who advocate education as being elitist. We are not elitist, we just know the importance of education. The right wing has been systematically trying to get rid of pulbic education in favor of vouchers which is nuts.

We know everyone can benefit from a good education and get stopped time after time by the right wing when dems try to fund programs like head start.

And Bush started those two wars. Neither Gore nor Kerry would have done that.

<< To: koan who wrote (107895) 1/22/2012 5:44:45 PM From: mel221 of 107902 >> You would be wrong in doing that.

I doubt it.

I'm really not interested in a conversation about your intellectual superiority.

However, I am interested in achieving our mutual goal of cutting military spending.

Politicians are feathering their own nest by looting the future and giving the monies to their special interest supporters.

Atleast the tea party has made efforts to shutdown the government in an effort to reduce total spending. That tea party effort resulted in the current plan to make minor cuts in military spending.

The liberals had complete control over the federal government for 2 years. Despite their intellectual superiority, they did nothing to significantly reduce military spending. The liberal intellectuals in the Senate cannot even produce a budget for the past 2 years.

What plan do you intellectually superior liberals have, one based in reality, for significantly reducing military spending?

The only option I see is a balanced budget amendment... An amendment universally rejected by liberals.



To: mel221 who wrote (107899)1/22/2012 11:35:52 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
The way the budget got balanced during the Clinton years is that the budget rules adopted by the Congress required that the only way a new program could b implemented is if a program in place of equal value got eliminated. This provision was allowed to expire during "W's" term.