Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (468270)	1/29/2012 8:15:15 PM
From: KLP	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793625

You right on Krauthammer...He isn't a 'has been'.... OTHER than he HAS BEEN totally favoring Romney....It's so obvious that it hurts....I had hoped he would be more objective..... Just so you know, right now, I think Romney will be the nominee, but here I agree with Sarah.... we NEED to know everything about these candidates. Certainly we do after the Media and the Democrats didn't tell us a darn thing about who Obama is, what his background was, what accomplishments he had to date in all of his 45-46 years when he was elected. Other than he was supposed to be a professor (????evidence of this) at Harvard, who taught Constitutional Law (???evidence of this), had a wife that wasn't proud of America UNTIL he was elected...two cute girls, and oh, yeah.....he smoked all sorts of stuff when in college (and for how long?) and he was a community organizer. And one more thing....wife was constantly whining during the campaign about how poor she thought she was, so where did the Obama's get the money so that he can present himself "one of the rich folks who should pay more taxes." "Hope n Change".....Well he got half that right ....he's changed things, that's for sure. So much so he can't even bring them up in the SOTU. Romney needs to make perfectly clear exactly what is wrong (in his opinion) item by item, with the ENTIRE Obamacare mess, and EXACTLY what he will do about it. So does Newt.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (468270)	1/30/2012 10:57:22 AM
From: Geoff Altman	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793625

she's trying to create such a divisive atmosphere between tea party (at least her definition of tea party) voters that if the 'establishment' republican wins, he'll be sufficiently weakened that he might lose in the general election.... I don't believe that for a second..... You'd have to be a pretty retarded conservative to think, gee, those GOPers are so nasty I, I really don't like any of them...... I think I'll vote for Obama and another 4 years of out of control spending and Constitution shredding.......

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (468270)	1/30/2012 11:29:28 AM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793625

Thompson: Mitt campaign has 'Drudge in their back pocket' By JENNIFER EPSTEIN \| 1/29/12 11:58 AM EST Former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) on Sunday attacked Mitt Romney for "unseemliness and overkill" in his aggressive campaign against Newt Gingrich, the candidate Thompson has endorsed. Romney's "modus operandi, basically, is to play Mr. Nice Guy until somebody gets close to him," Thompson said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "And then he unleashes his attack machine. And that's what happened in Iowa and it's what's happening in Florida." Thompson said that a story in Sunday's New York Times depicts "Romney's staff ... patting themselves on the back, talking about how mean and down they are. How they've got Matt Drudge in their back pocket. And how Romney is in on all of it." For months, Drudge has been running a steady stream of pro-Romney and anti-Gingrich stories on his website, Drudge Report. Read more about: Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Matt Drudge, Fred Thompson