Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (10210)	2/24/2012 9:19:56 AM
From: sm1th	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Atmospheric scientists are the same thing. They study the subject, most don't, and so we should listen to them. Now doesn't that make sense? You regularly reference Einstien and relativity as examples of science and why we should believe the experts. Relativity has been verified by experiments, that is how real science works. Where are the controlled experiments by your atmospheric scientists? They can't be done. They make computer models with a few thousand variables of a poorly understood system with billions of variables and use those to project hundreds of years into the future. Until they publicly admit the flaws and limitations of their models we absolutely should not listen to them.