SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Naggrachi who wrote (37022)11/23/1997 12:15:00 AM
From: Rocky Reid  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
>>Your right, a more ideal sense of humor was after concluding that the correction is over you start three postions and have them all go down throughout the week. <<

OK, Mister glass is half empty, my stock picks went down initially, then up, and are generally following the NASDAQ trends. One of them, INTC, is now trading slightly above what I paid. As for WDC and AOL, I am still well within 10% of what I paid. Hardly a catastrophic loss. As the NASDAQ rebounds, these stocks most assuredly will as well.

As I said before, check back in a week or two and we'll see who can wear the Smarty Pants.

>>The number one reason why I doubt your trades is that you always claim to have bought at the bottom and exited at the top. <<

Please provide any evidence of this.



To: Naggrachi who wrote (37022)11/23/1997 1:56:00 AM
From: FuzzFace  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
See the link at the bottom of:

techstocks.com

Of course the real irony is he accurately fortold IOM's bottom this year. He called 14, it actually went to 14 1/8. I sold at 14 1/4 just 1 or 2 days before the big jump, after holding since January. Now you know why Jack calls me Edloss.